Skip to main content
added 251 characters in body
Source Link
Travis J
  • 33.8k
  • 5
  • 75
  • 142
  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day, you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). AI remixes from multiple sources, and therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license.

Curious about the terms that apply to your content? Download it! Find the date your post was created, look up the ToS from Stack Overflow itself here: https://web.archive.org/web/20150701000000*/https://stackexchange.com/legal/terms-of-service .

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day, you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). AI remixes from multiple sources, and therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license.

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day, you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). AI remixes from multiple sources, and therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license.

Curious about the terms that apply to your content? Download it! Find the date your post was created, look up the ToS from Stack Overflow itself here: https://web.archive.org/web/20150701000000*/https://stackexchange.com/legal/terms-of-service .

Active reading.
Source Link
  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day, you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). AiAI remixes from multiple sources, and therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license.

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). Ai remixes from multiple sources therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day, you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). AI remixes from multiple sources, and therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license.

added 460 characters in body
Source Link
Travis J
  • 33.8k
  • 5
  • 75
  • 142
  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). Ai remixes from multiple sources therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

  1. This violates the user agreement as well as the content license, and if this sees the light of day you will be on the receiving end of a very large class action from a very informed group of people.

  2. If this goes forward, giving out content to be consumed by GenAI is to admit that you do not own the content, and thus there is no enforceability for protecting SO Network content from simply being copy pasted to a separate platform without attribution.

Proper attribution is defined in the license agreement, and that is what must be provided. There needs to be direct citation for works used; that is the license. Without direct citation, it is plagiarism unless the entirety of the work is remixed solely from one source and the source is referenced (which isn't the case here). Ai remixes from multiple sources therefore it must explicitly cite those sources discretely in order to abide by the license

Source Link
Travis J
  • 33.8k
  • 5
  • 75
  • 142
Loading