Timeline for Our Partnership with OpenAI
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17 at 8:22 | comment | added | Joachim | @SomeGuy That's an oversimplification. If Wikipedia suddenly would sell their body of data and leave all the users who shaped it in the dust, that wouldn't go down very well. Expectations were created, and they are increasingly being thrown to the winds. | |
| May 20 at 22:49 | comment | added | Some Guy | I never expected to get anything out of posting on SO. I provided work to the general public, for free, and SO provided me website hosting and the tech to make my questions and answers available to a wider public audience, for free, which maximizes the number of people that can be helped by what I post. That has always been the deal. I don't know why you would think that would change with AI. If you want to monetize your questions and answers, get your own site, pay for your own hosting and site design, and monetize away! Personally I am happy that SO distributes information for me for free. | |
| May 10 at 11:02 | comment | added | Gennady Dogaev | Pretty sure we will get nothing out of it and will need to pay OpenAI if we want to use the model trained on data we contributed to | |
| May 10 at 7:59 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | Very, very probably not directly as in "you contributed X% of the training material, here are Y% of the profits". | |
| May 9 at 14:52 | comment | added | Catija | To the best of my understanding, the value SE users get out of this is that the company is claiming they will spend the income to invest in the public platform, which is something that is sorely needed. | |
| May 9 at 6:28 | comment | added | VLAZ | Are SO users legally entitled to any benefits from the SE-OpenAI deal? | |
| May 9 at 5:35 | history | answered | Alex Punnen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |