Timeline for Should we have a policy about "too much downvoting"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Mar 19, 2010 at 0:35 | comment | added | Ether | @Jeff: I don't know how much it will affect everyone. What I do know that +10 for an upvote and only -2 for a downvote is absolutely not right; it rewards controversial posts. Downvotes really should penalize -10 when counteracting an upvote; perhaps they can still only do -2 damage (or -5) when the post's net score is less than 0, I don't know. Any of these would be worth trying out to see what happens. | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 23:57 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | I think the weight change will hurt the dynamic on SO; downvotes will go from being mostly cosmetic at -2/-1 to "bring the pain" at -5/-2 (or -3). Honestly, I would rather hurt 6 people than all of our users. | |
| Mar 18, 2010 at 23:50 | history | answered | Ether | CC BY-SA 2.5 |