Timeline for Questions with proprietary or confidential information
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 18:55 | comment | added | Shog9 | Keep in mind, this is rarely done, and nearly always done as a courtesy to folks who've posted something they regret (or should regret). I've routinely refused requests that smell like attempts to censor information someone else finds... Inconvenient. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 8:50 | history | edited | Mark Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 77 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 8:45 | comment | added | Mark Booth | @BCS - The trick is being loud to people who can do something about it (stack exchange developers and community managers can delete revisions) while being quiet with everyone else. | |
| Dec 1, 2011 at 13:09 | history | edited | Mark Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated my answer with a note to flag if you can't edit.
|
| Jun 28, 2010 at 17:12 | comment | added | BCS | For something like this, I don't think you could be overly loud. If there is information in the revision history that, from a legal standpoint, shouldn't be there, be as noise as you can (short of calling someone on their home phone at 4AM or, depending on what hours they keep, 10AM). | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 16:52 | history | answered | Mark Booth | CC BY-SA 2.5 |