Timeline for Stack Overflow and GotW
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2010 at 15:54 | history | edited | Andreas Bonini | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2010 at 9:49 | comment | added | John Saunders | @Kop: Since you agree that one should be split, it seems you concede my point. -1+1=0? | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 22:08 | comment | added | Andreas Bonini | I didn't see that particular one, and yes, that one would better be split. But it appears to be the exception: I've seen a dozen random ones and all of them would fit nicely into the SOFU format | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 20:18 | comment | added | John Saunders | @Kop: I answered after seeing gotw.ca/gotw/059.htm. I do not agree that these are "very similar questions". If someone on SO asked these questions, I'd request that they ask separate questions. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:54 | comment | added | Andreas Bonini | Actually, no, -1: see some GotW articles. Many of them already contain only one question; the others contain many different but very similar questions (and this happens in normal SO questions too, and it's allowed as far as I know). I think that splitting them up in separate threads would be counter productive in most (but possibly not all) cases | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 14:36 | comment | added | IAbstract | +1 we must all adhere to the SOFU format. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 1:40 | history | answered | John Saunders | CC BY-SA 2.5 |