Timeline for Super User and Server Fault are Doomed
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://serverfault.com/ with https://serverfault.com/
|
|
| Oct 2, 2010 at 17:34 | comment | added | barlop | lifehacker, has a good community for SU. | |
| Mar 30, 2010 at 8:57 | history | edited | Sam Cogan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2010 at 8:23 | comment | added | Sam Cogan | @jeff I completely understand that resources mean you can't do everything for everyone, but it often feels like SF (and SU) are the branch offices of the SO world, all the new shiny stuff happens at the head office (careers for example) and we're left waiting for things to be rolled out to the regions. It would be nice if eventually, when the VC money comes in hopefully, if there were some SF or SU orientated improvements and features. I'm not having a bitch, I know SO is the blockbuster site and the focus is on that, but I'm not a developer, I'm a sysadmin and I dearly want to see SF succeed. | |
| Mar 30, 2010 at 0:38 | comment | added | Locutus | if you really do have resource constraints, how can you even entertain the thought adding more sites to the trilogy? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/42373/… Unless you already spending some of that VC? | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 23:56 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | believe me, I love SF and SU, and I use them all the time.. but at the same time, given resource constraints, we have to focus at least initially on the one site that is the blockbuster. If only there were some way to for us have more "resources".. like something that rhymes with "centure vapital".. | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 23:55 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | Sam, you stated everything I couldn't have said better. Especially paragraph #2 has been a real pet peeve of mine, one I've brought up here a few times (meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14866/…). Another issue I've seen with SF lately is it's becoming a bit like SU with dozens of duplicate questions. So many times I've posted a comment with more than half a dozen duplicates of the question being asked. | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 23:28 | comment | added | Sam Cogan | @shog true, I know they have made attempts at this, and I understand it's hard to find someone like that in the Sysadmin community, it's just not as vocal as the developer community (or not in the blogging world) but it seems the focus on these sites has lost importance as of late. | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 23:25 | comment | added | Shog9 | AFAIK, Jeff & Co. know about the lack of leadership problem... But it's hard to break into a community you're not really part of. If you know who the Joel of SysAdmining is, maybe suggest he have a look at SF? | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 23:20 | history | answered | Sam Cogan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |