Timeline for Nicely discouraging serial upvoting
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2010 at 10:02 | comment | added | Gnoupi | @Questions - in this case, if it's only about notifying about something which already exists, I guess it's more or less ok. However, even if it exists already, the fact of pointing it with a warning might act as a "barrier", for users. when it's not visible, you don't have this effect. | |
| May 12, 2010 at 9:55 | comment | added | Pekka | it's not me who is suggesting putting barriers on anything. The barrier is already in place in the form of silent deletion of serial upvotes. I'd like people to become aware of the barrier. If it were up to me, there would be no such barrier in the first place (or one that is manually sorted out by moderators). | |
| May 12, 2010 at 9:52 | history | answered | Gnoupi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |