Timeline for How many on or off topic votes does a question need to count against questions needed now? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 at 20:18 | history | closed |
Cjxcz Odjcayrwl Martijn Pieters Himanshu Hugo Dozois ChrisFMod |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 13:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 31, 2014 at 20:18 | |||||
| Jun 30, 2010 at 20:14 | answer | added | serg | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 13, 2010 at 23:13 | comment | added | Gordon Gustafson | can a mod tag this FAQ at least? Otherwise, put it in the area51 faq page. | |
| Jun 8, 2010 at 17:33 | history | edited | C. Ross | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added current Math
|
| Jun 8, 2010 at 17:16 | answer | added | Arlen Beiler | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 7, 2010 at 17:07 | vote | accept | C. Ross | ||
| Jun 7, 2010 at 15:50 | answer | added | David Fullerton | timeline score: 20 | |
| Jun 7, 2010 at 15:49 | comment | added | Kyle Cronin Mod | @fmark it was just a guess, but I wasn't far off - the cutoff is 30 | |
| Jun 7, 2010 at 15:44 | answer | added | Kyle CroninMod | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jun 7, 2010 at 12:04 | history | edited | C. Ross | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added an update based on comments
|
| Jun 7, 2010 at 12:03 | comment | added | fmark | In GIS we've reached 25 off-topic votes, still no change. Sorry Kyle | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 18:19 | comment | added | Hamed | Ok, In Persian IT we have a question with 18 off-topic vote and another question with 14 on-topic vote still no change on required on-topic/off-topic numbers. | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 16:11 | comment | added | Gnome | @John: I doubt it's intentional. The site is in beta and things are changing quickly. | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 16:00 | answer | added | juan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 14:23 | comment | added | John C | @Kyle, thanks, I wondered. Is there any official listing of the requirements? Not sure why that information should be hidden. | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 4:29 | comment | added | Kyle Cronin Mod | It's greater than 16 at least. If I had to guess, it's probably 25. | |
| Jun 6, 2010 at 1:08 | comment | added | C. Ross | @John It could be that it's just not working, but I assumed the limit hadn't been reached yet. | |
| Jun 5, 2010 at 23:00 | comment | added | John C | Is the on/off-topic vote count even working yet? I looked at several of the top sites, and they all show "10 on/off-topic questions needed". | |
| Jun 5, 2010 at 22:24 | history | edited | C. Ross | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added math
|
| Jun 5, 2010 at 21:24 | comment | added | Gnome | @Robert: I think it more likely the thresholds are being evaluated in light of the voting limits. I believe they should be focusing on controversial questions instead of the clear-cut cases anyway, but that's already on Meta elsewhere. | |
| Jun 5, 2010 at 20:57 | comment | added | user102937 | @The Cat: Persian IT has already met its quota for followers. It also appears to have unambiguously on-topic answers, but the "good example" and "bad example" counts have not moved. Perhaps The Team has moved those counts out of the "definition" phase. | |
| Jun 5, 2010 at 20:43 | comment | added | Gnome | 10 + 10 is not 20 people, they can (and will) overlap. And they don't have to agree exactly. At least 60 followers are required anyway, and it's likely there will be more. I hate to say it... but maybe we should restrict example questions even further: 3 per person and force the old questions to be winnowed down to the limit. | |
| Jun 5, 2010 at 20:18 | history | asked | C. Ross | CC BY-SA 2.5 |