Timeline for Would rel="nofollow" be sensible for links to post revisions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:30 | vote | accept | Tomalak | ||
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:12 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:12 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:06 | answer | added | Pops | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 16:59 | comment | added | Pops | Hmm... this has been discussed before, but not in this light; see Questions with proprietary or confidential information. | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 16:53 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | Aren't all links in a post body nofollowed? Or are internal links not subject to this? | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 16:51 | history | asked | Tomalak | CC BY-SA 2.5 |