Timeline for What kind of idiot is Richard? - or: Expletives in answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 21:36 | comment | added | perbert | Today I got carried away reading about origins of a classical digital test image and ended up at www.lenna.org. At work. Could it be a problem? May be, most likely not (I'd like to think that my bosses have indeed something between their ears). Would both links be relevant to a related question at SO and should be kept unredacted? Yes. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 16:59 | comment | added | jjnguy | @George We have a link to a locked answer now though! I edited your stackapps post. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 12:43 | comment | added | waffles | re edit: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/31168/… | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 12:17 | comment | added | devinb | Hopefully my post is a valid compromise. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:34 | comment | added | Pekka | @George I happen to agree with the standard you link to by the way. But it has nothing to do with the issue at hand. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:27 | comment | added | uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN | @Gnoupi: You never know... besides, you might stumble accross it by way of a shortened URL or something. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:25 | comment | added | Gnoupi | In a way, if you go to read a "What is the best comment in source code you have ever encountered?" question during your work time... | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:24 | comment | added | uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN | @Pekka: Agreed. And in this case I'm voting "not show it at all". | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:23 | history | edited | uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 211 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:21 | comment | added | Pekka | As you know, I disagree (although I can see your point about corporate filters.) Re art: Not necessarily acceptable, no. But you don't alter art to make it acceptable. You either leave it as is, or don't show it at all. | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 8:15 | history | answered | uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN | CC BY-SA 2.5 |