Timeline for At what point do you put your SO reputation in your resume? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
49 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2017 at 16:15 | history | edited | ale |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 10, 2015 at 4:45 | history | unlocked | animusonStaffMod | ||
| S Jun 28, 2015 at 14:37 | history | locked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 28, 2015 at 14:37 | history | closed |
ᔕᖺᘎᕊ Wrzlprmft James nicael Infinite Recursion |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jun 28, 2015 at 11:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 28, 2015 at 14:37 | |||||
| Aug 15, 2012 at 3:39 | answer | added | Nick LarsenMod | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 22, 2011 at 11:54 | answer | added | Shivan Dragon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 10, 2011 at 1:15 | answer | added | karlphillip | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 21, 2011 at 7:05 | history | edited | Brad Mace |
better fitting tags
|
|
| Aug 4, 2010 at 21:19 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki | ||
| Jul 29, 2010 at 15:20 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Oct 29, 2009 at 18:29 | answer | added | Pollyanna | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 18, 2009 at 13:47 | answer | added | Philippe Carriere | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 1, 2009 at 8:20 | answer | added | lprsd | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 26, 2009 at 13:39 | comment | added | Greg | This is a joke right? LOL! I can't believe you got me | |
| Mar 26, 2009 at 13:26 | answer | added | Paul Nathan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 6, 2009 at 14:28 | comment | added | Pollyanna | Just the musings of a weirdo. While the answers here are interesting no one took the challenge of the second question "Imagine a world where this was common..." It certainly doesn't matter, but as with any system of accounting there is some value in considering future usage of the value. | |
| Feb 6, 2009 at 7:30 | comment | added | Seventh Element | Is this the definition of being desperate? | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 19:42 | comment | added | Robert S. | Just another vague ego boost. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 18:01 | answer | added | kdgregory | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 17:31 | answer | added | Steven A. Lowe | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 17:29 | answer | added | Tony Lambert | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 17:22 | answer | added | Marcus | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:47 | answer | added | Nathan Feger | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:45 | answer | added | anonymous | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:28 | comment | added | amdfan | A related (although more general) question is "Is Stack Overflow Reputation Marketable?" | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:26 | answer | added | DevelopingChris | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:16 | comment | added | Pollyanna | Yes, that is a better indicator of programming passion, but it's becoming more commonplace for career oriented programmers to work a little on open source projects just to appear as passionate about programming as their peers. Rep isn't perfect, it's merely another indicator. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:15 | answer | added | SmacL | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:06 | comment | added | Paul Tomblin | Yeah, but the passion for programming can be better shown by mentioning the programming you do when you're done with work for the night. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:04 | comment | added | Pollyanna | I especially like HermanD's point that rep can indicate a genuine interest in and love of programming - passion for it. Sometimes it's hard to discern programmers who love it from those who say they love it. stackoverflow.com/questions/424727/#424753 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 16:00 | answer | added | bananakata | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:58 | answer | added | Robert S. | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:58 | comment | added | icelava | I think you need to remember that reputation number is a highly abitrary and subjective value. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:57 | comment | added | Robert S. | I think Jon Skeet's rep # would be the least impressive thing on his resume. Not to call him out specifically; he's just the "top 25er" I'm most familiar with. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:54 | answer | added | Joel Coehoorn | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:54 | answer | added | Kev | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:52 | answer | added | Sergio | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:51 | answer | added | ChrisLively | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:50 | answer | added | Rob Prouse | timeline score: 38 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:50 | answer | added | Paul Tomblin | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:49 | answer | added | Jon Skeet | timeline score: 24 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:48 | answer | added | DanSingerman | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:47 | answer | added | z - | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:46 | answer | added | Jeff Yates | timeline score: 103 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:45 | answer | added | Damien | timeline score: 50 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:45 | comment | added | Paul Tomblin | Of course, as soon as I read this, I had to go check to make sure I was in the top 25. Phew! Just made it. | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:45 | answer | added | Mike B | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 8, 2009 at 15:43 | history | asked | CC BY-SA 2.5 |