Timeline for What to do about rep inflation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 at 1:47 | comment | added | endolith | @Oorang: I'd like to see that flowchart | |
| Dec 7, 2010 at 23:21 | comment | added | hasen | I haven't used SO for several months, but my reputation keeps going up (from my already existing answers), it looks like I'll hit 10k soon. I didn't really do anything special during this period to deserve earning "more trust" than I had before. | |
| Jul 5, 2009 at 22:12 | comment | added | Marc Gravell | In terms of "who watches the watchmen?", that is the ♦ moderators... and to pre-empt "who watches the ♦ moderators?"; the ♦ moderator actions are logged, so any abuse is easy to track. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 17:27 | comment | added | spoulson | The real question is: What do we do about (active) mod count inflation? Maybe mods inactive for 30+ days should be temporarily demoted until they've remained active for a week? | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 17:02 | comment | added | Oorang | Thousands of mods is such a horrible idea I need a flow chart to explain the ways it can go wrong. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 16:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:29 | comment | added | EndangeredMassa Mod | I'm sure that the SO team will nix anyone's mod privileges if they abuse them. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:28 | comment | added | Ólafur Waage | There are true moderators that have a much larger access than 3k and 10k mods. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:28 | comment | added | TheTXI | Who watches the Watchmen???? | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:27 | comment | added | user95071 | Yeah, I'm actually OK w/ large numbers of mods, and this isn't a question you want to answer with premature action. But someday a mod will go completely postal, and someone will assert a need for a "mod of mods". Probably best to wait until then. | |
| Jun 29, 2009 at 13:21 | history | answered | Ólafur Waage | CC BY-SA 2.5 |