2 Got annoyed by that CSS bug with the blockquote
source | link

Moderators are entrusted with these abilities so that they may use them.

A user with a reputation of 3K has the ability to vote to close, but does not have this responsibility - he did not ask for the vote, and so he is not obligated to make use of it. However, the moderator did ask for it, and implicit in this is the expectation that, should he be entrusted by the community with these tools, he will make judicious use of them.

Should a moderator close a question when he is unsure that it should be closed? No. Nor should you, upon encountering a question you are unsure of, vote to close it. But the moderator, when convinced of the need, must close. He cannot shrug his shoulders and say, "Someone else will take care of this"; we did not grant him his abilities so that he should let them sit idle. Why should five others waste their time and votes closing a question when the moderator they elected possesses both the knowledge and power to do so in an instant?

A moderator who shirks his duty is useless. His position should be taken from him and given to someone who will make use of it.

I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away.

I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away.

Moderators are entrusted with these abilities so that they may use them.

A user with a reputation of 3K has the ability to vote to close, but does not have this responsibility - he did not ask for the vote, and so he is not obligated to make use of it. However, the moderator did ask for it, and implicit in this is the expectation that, should he be entrusted by the community with these tools, he will make judicious use of them.

Should a moderator close a question when he is unsure that it should be closed? No. Nor should you, upon encountering a question you are unsure of, vote to close it. But the moderator, when convinced of the need, must close. He cannot shrug his shoulders and say, "Someone else will take care of this"; we did not grant him his abilities so that he should let them sit idle. Why should five others waste their time and votes closing a question when the moderator they elected possesses both the knowledge and power to do so in an instant?

A moderator who shirks his duty is useless. His position should be taken from him and given to someone who will make use of it.

I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away.

Moderators are entrusted with these abilities so that they may use them.

A user with a reputation of 3K has the ability to vote to close, but does not have this responsibility - he did not ask for the vote, and so he is not obligated to make use of it. However, the moderator did ask for it, and implicit in this is the expectation that, should he be entrusted by the community with these tools, he will make judicious use of them.

Should a moderator close a question when he is unsure that it should be closed? No. Nor should you, upon encountering a question you are unsure of, vote to close it. But the moderator, when convinced of the need, must close. He cannot shrug his shoulders and say, "Someone else will take care of this"; we did not grant him his abilities so that he should let them sit idle. Why should five others waste their time and votes closing a question when the moderator they elected possesses both the knowledge and power to do so in an instant?

A moderator who shirks his duty is useless. His position should be taken from him and given to someone who will make use of it.

I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away.

1
source | link

Moderators are entrusted with these abilities so that they may use them.

A user with a reputation of 3K has the ability to vote to close, but does not have this responsibility - he did not ask for the vote, and so he is not obligated to make use of it. However, the moderator did ask for it, and implicit in this is the expectation that, should he be entrusted by the community with these tools, he will make judicious use of them.

Should a moderator close a question when he is unsure that it should be closed? No. Nor should you, upon encountering a question you are unsure of, vote to close it. But the moderator, when convinced of the need, must close. He cannot shrug his shoulders and say, "Someone else will take care of this"; we did not grant him his abilities so that he should let them sit idle. Why should five others waste their time and votes closing a question when the moderator they elected possesses both the knowledge and power to do so in an instant?

A moderator who shirks his duty is useless. His position should be taken from him and given to someone who will make use of it.

I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what he has will be taken away.