Timeline for Badge for reaching a high flag weighting score? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2019 at 2:17 | history | closed |
Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog Rob PolyGeo discussion Users with the discussion badge or a synonym can single-handedly close discussion questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of New badges for the increased flag-weight | |
| Sep 2, 2019 at 0:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 2, 2019 at 2:17 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Feb 25, 2011 at 23:57 | history | edited | randomMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 25, 2011 at 23:44 | vote | accept | DMA57361 | ||
| Feb 25, 2011 at 23:44 | answer | added | DMA57361 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 23:18 | comment | added | Brad Larson | It appears that this is now completed with the "Deputy" badge: stackoverflow.com/badges/1002/deputy | |
| Feb 22, 2011 at 21:07 | comment | added | DMA57361 | @dmckee - according to info elsewhere (like the link in the question) the flag weight maxes out at a value of 500, so this is probably the "default" target in my mind - but the team would have to assess the current distribution for a suitable threshold if anything was to be introduced. | |
| Feb 22, 2011 at 20:52 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Aside: What values would be "high". I mean, I know what my weighting score is but have no idea what the distribution looks like. I am a flagging god, a loser, or just this guy who sometimes flags things? | |
| Feb 22, 2011 at 15:39 | comment | added | DMA57361 | @Tim Hmmm, a good point RE privacy. And if they're flagging wildly to get the badge they're likely to lose flag weight anyway; they won't get the badge, and their flags will drop to the bottom of the list. Although, I guess this is much less of a problem on every other site compared to SO so I probably miss some perspective in terms of volume... | |
| Feb 22, 2011 at 15:35 | comment | added | user50049 | Some users might object to that, as it would be obvious to everyone that they frequently flag things. Additionally, while I don't want to discourage flags, I don't want to encourage people to flag stuff just to win a badge, I'm afraid that might drop the signal to noise ratio. Still, I really would like to see the people who do a lot of the heavy lifting rewarded in some way. +1 for the idea of rewarding them, but I'm not sure about the badge. | |
| Feb 22, 2011 at 15:25 | history | asked | DMA57361 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |