Timeline for Please don't migrate low-quality questions to other sites
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2011 at 8:58 | comment | added | Rob Moir | I have to agree with Zoredache - if you don't know if a question is good enough to be migrated and you're not willing to invest the time checking then leave it alone rather than blindly migrate. | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 7:28 | comment | added | Zoredache | if it is really so much effort, why not just do nothing, or just close, and not migrate. It seems like it is better to close questions and expect the person asking the question to open a new question on the correct site then migrate something when you are not certain it is appropriate. | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 1:37 | comment | added | Wesley | This raises a point: Bad questions should die where they are found, not carried across borders to be killed there. I believe that there is a class of questions that are obviously supposed to be killed on sight out of courtesy for the sister sites and their community. As for "It's easier for a SF person to determine..." that's reasonable to a point. However, "do U haz teh codes" questions, as this question seems obviously to be, should be able to be determined to be killworthy by the community. And now we're back to frustration over the unilateral decision. | |
| Mar 13, 2011 at 0:49 | history | answered | Andrew Grimm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |