Timeline for "Improve" can fail to associate the approving user with the edit record
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 27, 2011 at 12:37 | vote | accept | Grace NoteStaffMod | ||
| Apr 27, 2011 at 10:09 | comment | added | Arjan | Hmmm, thinking about it, that must have been quite a difficult change! I guess a suggested edit now is not removed from the list, just in case you don't change anything after clicking "Improve". Then, while you're improving, someone may actually accept or reject the suggested edit? Nice! | |
| Apr 27, 2011 at 9:51 | history | edited | YOU | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 83 characters in body; added 8 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2011 at 14:14 | history | edited | YOU | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2011 at 14:10 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | There is no reputation penalty to the 2000+ user for doing this. In fact, because they can't be attributed to the act (and thus cannot be subject to revenge downvoting for that act), it's actually safer for them if they're concerned for their reputation. The anonymity is the much larger issue, we have a system to track who is approving these so that we can detect when users are approving things and who might be making good/bad approvals. This really mars that. | |
| Apr 8, 2011 at 14:07 | history | answered | YOU | CC BY-SA 3.0 |