Timeline for Why was this question closed as off-topic without being migrated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 16, 2011 at 9:18 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 90 | |
| May 16, 2011 at 5:05 | comment | added | Cody Gray | Ah, yes. I was on my iPhone earlier, so I didn't read as carefully as I normally would have... To answer your question, I (and I think he, but I can't really speak for others) tend to close questions that are off-topic but not worthy as migration as plain "off-topic". I reserve NARQ for things that would be on-topic, but are simply poor, invalid, or unanswerable questions. In the end, it's probably irrelevant which you choose--the point is to get the bad questions closed before they start attracting too many answers. | |
| May 16, 2011 at 2:33 | comment | added | Andrew Grimm | @Cody Gray: I tried to address this possibility in the second last paragraph. | |
| May 16, 2011 at 1:30 | comment | added | Cody Gray | It probably could have been migrated, but I suspect this is the reason that Jeff didn't. | |
| May 16, 2011 at 1:20 | vote | accept | Andrew Grimm | ||
| May 16, 2011 at 0:39 | answer | added | Anthony Pegram | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 16, 2011 at 0:38 | answer | added | user149432 | timeline score: 18 | |
| May 16, 2011 at 0:27 | history | asked | Andrew Grimm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |