Timeline for Mitigating publicity-driven vote inflation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jun 27, 2011 at 22:07 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | That's the hope! | |
| Jun 27, 2011 at 22:00 | comment | added | Eric Lippert | @Tomalak: Oh, absolutely I think it is reasonable to bring this up and discuss it. Better to actually make a rational decision based on consideration of the facts rather than just let it slide and hope for the best. | |
| Jun 27, 2011 at 21:58 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | I can't disagree with you on any of these points. But, it's clearly a thing so I thought it worth bringing up, whether we decide in the end that it's important or not. I still think that these edge cases represent a symptom of scenarios that we're just lucky happen so rarely at present; that the voting system doesn't represent "fairness" across different questions is a problem when we define "quality" as score. I honestly don't know how much of a "big deal" it is, but it does make me anxious enough to have opened this discussion. :) | |
| Jun 27, 2011 at 21:57 | history | edited | Eric Lippert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 80 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2011 at 21:49 | history | answered | Eric Lippert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |