28

I'm not a prude - but f***vimmeanpeople seems like quite a rude and unacceptable username. Since we can't flag users - just questions - is it possible to make this username something a little more innocuous?

Edit: Ah, it seems he didn't learn the first time. Came back with f***meanpeopleingeneral. How original.

3
  • 14
    Typically you just flag one of the user's posts at random if you want to flag something about that user specifically Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 2:04
  • 4
    And furthermore, the tiny fraction of vim people who are mean hardly seems worthy of making a statement about. Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 2:42
  • 4
    @Rick: Yeah, but they all deny the holy truth of emacs... Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 2:54

3 Answers 3

12

A moderator already renamed that account.
The user then created another account with a different Mailinator address (which I renamed) and asked the same question.

If this recurs, we'll need an IP ban.

2
6

As all three accounts are clearly the same person, I've merged them together.

6
  • 2
    That will probably trigger the automatic post ban on IP address. Nice.
    – Arjan
    Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11
  • @Arjan - That's also what I figured, which made it the simplest solution to all the issues.
    – Dori
    Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 10:13
  • I suspect that an automatic ban would need one or two more questions.
    – SLaks
    Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 12:33
  • @SLaks, am I right to assume that moderators can see if a post-ban is in place? (If not, then Show some indication that account is banned from asking new questions might be more useful than I would have imagined.)
    – Arjan
    Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 12:43
  • @Arjan: Not that I know of.
    – SLaks
    Commented Aug 21, 2011 at 12:51
  • The user was "temporarily banned" until Aug of 2012. Commented Aug 23, 2011 at 16:35
0

There should be a very short list of users names that aren't acceptable.

Occasionally there are names that contain foul language, use hate speech, or refer to body parts.

The owners can decide a few words that they simply don't want to show up on their site.

Beyond a very short list, any words on a slightly longer list should automatically notify the site's moderator (and if the change is network-wide, also the moderators here) that they should look at the name change, possibly even approve it before it goes live.

That way people can write whatever for a username and their free speech rights would be respected without blasting everyone with foul language or hate speech.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .