I don't have the credit to suggest this, but it's a no-brainer: Make a synonym of .

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Infinite Recursion, Aza, rene, Doorknob Jan 10 '15 at 13:05

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Infinite Recursion, Aza, rene, Doorknob
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Is there a reason that you need ruby-on-rails, ruby-on-rails-3, and ruby-on-rails-3.1? 144 questions are tagged with all three. – Kevin Vermeer Oct 5 '11 at 20:11
  • There are questions that are specific to specific versions, which is why all three tags are useful. There are people who can answer a ruby-on-rails-3.1 question but who are only subscribed to the ruby-on-rails tag, which is why it is advantageous to tag a question with both. I agree that it's messy, but this is what creates that behavior. – John Bachir Oct 5 '11 at 20:22

Browse other questions tagged .