-10

If I have ALL of the required badges to be a moderator, save Yearling.

Why should that one badge disqualify anyone?

Some people have been active users for almost a year.

I see no reason why not having one of the six badges (especially one that has nothing to do with the quality of their work) should disqualify anyone as a moderator.

Can we change the rules so that Yearling is not required, but maybe is a plus when getting into the primaries?

We Don't Need No Stinkin' Badges!

Improve this question
14
  • 7
    lol. Wow HARSH ^_^
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:21
  • 1
    @Rocket no freakin idea. but my nomination was removed because i did not have one stinkin badge...
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:23
  • 2
    There's required badges? I can understand Yearling, but there are others?
    – cHao
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:23
  • 14
    @AManAPlanACanalPanama: Not really the attitude from someone who wants to be a moderator is it? Nominations have only just opened so I would imagine the requirements may change based on feedback. (It already has as the Pundit badge was a requirement but has now been removed)
    – codingbadger
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:25
  • @Barry i updated the question's question to sound less pompous
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:25
  • 7
    Ranting about it probably won’t make it change for this election, and it definitely does’t put you in a better light for the job… but maybe that’s just me.
    – poke
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:25
  • 1
    @Barry: Shouldn't this count as "feedback"?
    – jscs
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:26
  • @poke ha, i see that now ^_^ but its a little late now.
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:26
  • @JoshCaswell: I should have said "constructive feedback" rather than just feedback.
    – codingbadger
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:28
  • @Barry: Fair enough.
    – jscs
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:32
  • 2
    I find it incredible that this legitimate question has been downvoted so much. @AManAPlanACanalPanama was simply curious as to why Yearling was a necessary badge, and he's being punished for it.
    – zzzzBov
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:34
  • @zzzzBov thanks ^_^ although it comes with the territory. sometimes you get a bad bout and people can't help but to follow in other's footsteps
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:35
  • 1
    @AManAPlanACanalPanama - at the rate you're going you'll be banned from meta for this post :) and all its downvotes lol.
    – JonH
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:58
  • @JonH it has happened before ^_^. and I have come back from it :-D
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 21:00
18

After some review, we have decided to revoke the requirement for the Yearling badge (much like we did with Pundit).

Improve this answer
5
  • I noticed that my revoked nomination is back, but I cannot comment on it, why is that?
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 21:45
  • @AMan I'll get someone to look into that. We had the same happen on Gaming earlier.
    – Grace Note StaffMod
    Nov 7 '11 at 21:47
  • Can you please let me know when that is fixed? it is quite frustrating.... :-(
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 21:53
  • Good move Grace!
    – genesis
    Nov 8 '11 at 13:32
  • 12
    This is really a terrible idea. Is there such a dearth of qualified candidates that have been around a year that we need to expand the pool that much more? Being around a year indicates commitment to the site.
    – JNK
    Nov 9 '11 at 13:03
28

My guess is that they want people who have been active on SO for at least a year. It won't be long before another election is run (at most a year). If you are serious about participating wait until you actually meet the requirements.

Improve this answer
4

The reason is simply dedication.

As a moderator you're given enhanced privileges, and we'd like to be certain that you're going to use them actively and fairly.

If you haven't been committed to SO for at least a year, how do we know that you're going to stick around once you've become a moderator?

Improve this answer
3
  • 1
    Ha. It should be at least half a year. not a year. I have been commited if you see anyone's rep history who has previously been nominated then removed that they are fully active.
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:39
  • Also as a side point, alot of the people who get the yearling badges are users who have not been on in a while and have very low rep.
    – Naftali
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:40
  • @AManAPlanACanalPanama, I recently achieved the Yearling badge, but after observing last years election, I fully understand that I'm not qualified to be a moderator. I am missing a couple badges that are in the list as required, but more importantly, I know i'm not dedicated enough to be a moderator. Despite having some of the higher-level privileges, I rarely if ever use them.
    – zzzzBov
    Nov 7 '11 at 20:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .