I think the fact my answer was accepted demonstrates that I understood the question, and I believe that my edits would have given the question more attention in general from other users with the potential to answer the question. I'm not terribly concerned about rep, I'm just curious about how to proceed in a case like this. Should I resubmit the suggested edits? Is there some sort of appeal process? Since the answer is accepted should I even bother?
You can bring it up in the site's chat, e.g., "Anything wrong with my suggested edit here?".
This is what I did when my edit on Ask Different got rejected. A local high-rep user (actually, a mod) agreed with the edit, and implemented it himself. No +2 for me, but that wasn't the point of editing.
I was hit by this issue as well: my edit was approved by two editors, and rejected by others. Those who rejected it had no experience whatsoever with the subject matter (MongoDB).
It is highly frustrating that people with experience in one domain, can wield their power in areas they are not competent in. If society worked that way, then Albert Einstein would be allowed to perform brain surgery.
- do implement a mechanism to challenge rejected edits
- or, disallow editors from accepting/rejecting an edit if they don't have experience with any of the tags of the question
In the section I disagree with the reasons why my edit was rejected. What can I do? in this very well written and complete answer states the following:
- Ask for clarification about why your edit was rejected in the site's chat.
- Do not simply suggest the edit again, or it will likely be rejected again.
- If the edit was to address a legitimate policy concern, flag the post for moderator attention.