So I just read that post and I was just wondering if there is a practical reason for the default flag weight value to be 100.

Why doesn't it start at 0, is there a logic I don't get behind all that?


Why doesn't it start at 0, is there a logic I don't get behind all that?

If the flag weight drops below zero, all flags from the user are suppressed. Setting the flag weight to zero for a new user would mean that their first mistake in flagging would result in flags being suppressed - so the team has set the default flag weight to a reasonable limit.

Besides, having something above zero from start is kinda nice, isn't it? :)

  • Yes I'm not criticizing this system I was just curious :). For the suppression thing I guess a declined flags counter vs a useful flags counter could have done the trick. – talnicolas Nov 28 '11 at 6:34
  • Don't think counters would be a good idea - how do you set the limit? Setting an arbitrary number after which flags get suppressed wouldn't be very nice. With this you get a decent cushion & the cushion increases with each good flag @talnicolas – Sathyajith Bhat Nov 28 '11 at 6:37

The fact that flag weight starts at 100 tells me that you should be able to compare two users' flag weights as if they were percentages. So having a weight of 320 means your flags are 2.133x stronger than those of someone with a weight of 150, and a flag weight of 20 means your flags are worth a fifth of a new user's flags. This would explain why a weight of 0 supresses flags.

Or maybe they just picked 100 to fool people into thinking exactly this.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .