Lately I've been noticing a number of questions being closed under the "Not Constructive" criteria. Some of these are clearly very constructive, in the sense of containing, as answers, useful tips and knowledge that people can use to do constructive things. I understand there is a reason to close questions that cause emotional or highly subjective responses, but in these cases, the question can only be seen as generating useful, objective and non-emotional responses. In fact, in most of the cases I've seen, the answers have all been exactly that.

For reference, the text of the "Not Constructive" reason:

We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; 
this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, 
or extended discussion.

Here is an example of a closure I can't understand: https://stackoverflow.com/q/826208/240633

Although the title seems to indicate some sort of Vim jihad, the questioner is simply asking for ways to use vim keybindings in other tools. To me, this is perfectly reasonable and entirely "constructive". The only clauses that remotely applies to this question, that I can see, are possibly the "polling" or "extended discussion", but I don't see opinions being solicited so it's not a poll, and since answers are particular ways to do what the OP asks, I'm not sure how "extended discussion" applies either.

Another example: https://stackoverflow.com/q/95072/240633

Although I understand this is an open-ended question, and in some sense a poll, the answers are useful, and it devalues this site when such questions aren't allowed in some form. If the intent of "Not Constructive" is to disallow all poll-like questions, there is no place for a lot of useful answers.

I had another example - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1295634/best-gvim-tricks-for-programming - but the question was deleted shortly after I posted a negative comment about the moderation. Google has a cache without my comment and before the moderation: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FhiaICeRrooJ:stackoverflow.com/questions/1295634/best-gvim-tricks-for-programming+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

  • 6
    The OP of the "Making VIM Ubiquitous" question is asking specifically for a list, and not an answer. Can you edit the question in such a way that it's no longer a list question? List questions are covered specifically by the FAQ, here: stackoverflow.com/faq#dontask. Also, this example is nearly two years old, and the community was more tolerant of such questions back then.
    – user102937
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 19:42
  • 4
    Your third example was deleted by four community member votes.
    – user102937
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 19:44
  • 3
    The "What are your favorite VIM tricks" question has fourteen delete votes on it.
    – user102937
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 19:47
  • Note that casperOne did not delete that last question. I've added a link, so that users with at least 10K reputation on SO can see that it was deleted by four ordinary users.
    – Shog9
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 19:47
  • 3
    @Robert Harvey, If the "Not Constructive" reason is in part a prohibition against questions with multiple correct answers, it should state this explicitly. Otherwise, it is open to interpretation.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 19:58
  • OK, my apologies to casperone, it appeared as such.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:00
  • 1
    @Robert Harvey, on the delete votes, this sort of information isn't visible to me so I'm going on what I see. But in any case, I don't really care who is closing these questions, it's why useful questions (and especially the answers) are being closed. It seems rather silly to close questions because they have too many good answers.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:05
  • 10
    That's a straw man. Of course, they're not being closed because they have too many good answers; they are being closed because these kinds of questions are not a good fit for the site. Open-ended questions are a particularly contentious issue for Stack Overflow because many people like them. But I like driving too fast, and so do many other people; that doesn't mean it's a good idea.
    – user102937
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:09
  • 1
    You might investigate the local race track, and SO should find a place for questions like this. They are often valuable. In any case, if open ended questions are not allowed here, the language for "Not constructive" should be more explicit so there is less misunderstanding.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:18
  • 5
    @egosys We have found a place -- Yahoo! Answers. I don't see how it is the responsibility the SE to host questions they don't want, any more than it's a good idea for a municipality to use taxpayer money to build a racetrack for speeders.
    – user154510
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 21:49
  • @MatthewRead, thanks for that analogy. I had thought of SO as a for-profit business whose value is the hosted questions and answers, but thinking of it as a crooked municipality run by boss hogg is making a lot more sense ;-)
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 4, 2011 at 1:12
  • 3
    @ergosys: I vote to close and delete any question like that. I'm not paid by SO.
    – user7116
    Commented Dec 4, 2011 at 1:34
  • 4
    @AndrewBarber, I'm not sure where you are getting that. I noticed a discrepency in the reason for closing some questions, mainly obviously "constructive", to me anyway, questions were being closed for being non-constructive. Apparently "the site" doesn't want any open ended questions, so be it, but the reason for closing should explicitly say that so there is less confusion in the future. This later part is not part of the scope of my question, but part of my new understanding. continued..
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 4, 2011 at 19:23
  • 2
    continued... Frankly I don't understand why such useful questions don't have a place somewhere on SO, but I don't really care enough to argue about it. Excuse me for trying to improve things, I'll stop now.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 4, 2011 at 19:23
  • 1
    I have also had questions closed as being overly broad, yet this in of itself, is vague. Yes we are all humans, but some questions shouldn't evaporate because they are not the flavor-du-jor. Commented Jan 6, 2012 at 15:54

5 Answers 5


Possibly; regardless of my opinion on the examples you've posted, it should be clear that moderators are human and do make mistakes.

Fortunately, the community has the ability to re-open questions closed by moderators (or other users) and by doing so forestall the deletion of such questions.

If you want additional attention for a question you feel has been wrongly closed, feel free to bring it up here on Meta, or in chat - there's even a dedicated chatroom for users to collaborate on and discuss the moderation of specific questions.

Users with at least 10K reputation points on Stack Overflow have access to additional tools for reviewing questions that have been or are about to be closed or deleted. Community-minded users should take full advantage of this...

  • The third question I mentioned was closed sometime after Nov 28 (according to google's cache), and deleted sometime before now, Dec 3. Four days isn't much time to save a question from mistaken moderation, much less even notice that it was closed. Also, I'm not after a specific question, it just seems like the "not constructive" reason is being applied to questions it shouldn't be.
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:24
  • @ergosys: it was deleted fairly quickly. That said, there's a two-day waiting period after closing, during which users with less than 20K reputation points cannot vote to delete a closed question - so most of the time, you'll have at least two days to review recently-closed questions. In this case, the last user voted ~5 days after the question was closed.
    – Shog9
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:27
  • 1
    that's way too small of a window to correct human error (speaking in general, not specifically about that question).
    – ergosys
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:31
  • 4
    @ergosys: after those two days, the question still needs to collect enough delete votes (at least three, more for highly-up-voted content) to actually cause it to be deleted. Note that the first two questions you linked to have been closed for weeks and months respectively, without being deleted - even though it has 14 votes right now, it'd take 97 to actually delete it; that effectively means it won't be, unless a moderator steps in and finishes the job. In effect, the more popular a question is, the longer folks have to save it if it gets closed...
    – Shog9
    Commented Dec 3, 2011 at 20:40
  • Are you sure that a regular user can vote to reopen a question that was closed by a moderator?
    – Andomar
    Commented May 19, 2013 at 17:08
  • Yes I am, @andomar
    – Shog9
    Commented May 19, 2013 at 17:42

I don't like the term "not constructive." The term I would use is "not definitive." The text would be something like: "This question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion because it cannot be answered clearly and definitively using facts, references, or specific expertise."

On this site, a "not constructive" question could mean one that attracts too many "pretty good" possible answers but no one that stands out from all the rest. "Not constructive" is a SITE definition that means "The question does not lend itself well to one best answer.

Thus, there can be many "good" questions that the moderators close because they are "not constructive" as the SITE defines the term.


Yes, there are many open-ended, subjective and list-request questions, which are highly upvoted, that are closed as not constructive.

But in fact, they are the perfect fit for:

We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

So the moderators are just being just and treating all the questions the same, no matter when they were asked and how many upvotes they have.

I personally think that list questions or recommendation questions may sometimes be useful, but I respect the guidelines of SE owners. If such questions are not welcomed not, the old questions following the same pattern should be closed too. Otherwise we would have a flood of posts like that:

Why my question for favorite trick / best tools library / best tutorial was closed? There is question X which is similar to mine and it has 300 upvotes! I thought such questions should be used as example what is good and welcomed here?


I've seen many questions closed as "not constructive" or "off-topic" even though the community had clearly shown otherwise. Most recent example, today, was a Community Wiki question active since 2008 which was single-handedly put on hold by a moderator.

  • And how is this an answer to the question? It seems more like a comment to me...
    – hichris123
    Commented Feb 24, 2014 at 1:55
  • The question was "Are moderators closing good questions as “Not constructive”", and my answer expands on why I think that's the case. Commented Feb 24, 2014 at 1:57
  • 3
    Whether we like it or not, the closing of stuff like this is consensus these days. It's not an issue of moderators acting against the community's will - with a half a million questions in the close votes queue, moderators are supposed to use their powers on clear-cut cases like this one, instead of waiting for 5 community close votes to trickle in.
    – Pekka
    Commented Feb 24, 2014 at 2:05

UPDATE: since the time of the question the new sites Software Recommendations and Hardware Recommendations-beta were created, to which many of closed questions should migrate.

I agree with your point in comments, that community should find a place for questions that currently do not fit to Q&A format. They are often valuable. I've posted my suggestion at https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/180767/new-stackexchange-discussion-site-for-not-constructive-questions.

Unfortunately, many of community members made their opinion and do not listen for different suggestions, that will reduce unending fight with recommendation/multiple answers questions.

  • 8
    This isn't really about community members that won't listen to different suggestions. Stack Exchange is not interested in hosting a site for questions that don't fit their general guidelines. Nothing unreasonable or unexpected about that.
    – yannis
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 18:06
  • 1
    made their opinion and do not listen That's contradicting yourself. It's not that nobody's listening, it's that people are listening and rejecting the suggestion for reasons that they are explaining to you. If they weren't listening they'd just ignore the question and not post anything.
    – Servy
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 18:28
  • 1
    There is absolutely no obligation upon anyone whatsoever to make every conceivable question fit somewhere within the Stack Exchange network of sites. Period. End of story. End of debate.
    – user164207
    Commented May 18, 2013 at 20:02
  • @servy, I feel that people do not read my arguments, but just see the word "discussion" and immediately react "NO". May be my suggestion is too long to read? Commented May 19, 2013 at 3:28
  • 3
    @MichaelFreidgeim You seem to think that you've stumbled onto a really special and unique idea. The simple fact is you haven't. You're just making the same arguments/suggestions that have been made dozens of times before. In fact, you're the one that appears to have done taken the time and effort to read the existing questions on that topic before posting your question. Had you read through the many existing discussions of that topic you would have already seen your suggestion rejected a number of times as well as a number of reasons as to why.
    – Servy
    Commented May 19, 2013 at 4:12
  • @Servy, I've read a lot of discussions and see that is a problem, that SO tries to fight unsuccessfully for many years, because people keep asking good questions, that do not fit into SO Q&A format. Keep them closed is half-measure. Moving them to a separate site with different rules is an approach, that will send a clear message to users- recommendations questions are not allowed on SO, but they can be asked and answered on different site. Commented May 19, 2013 at 8:43
  • 4
    @MichaelFreidgeim The thing is... we build communities, not just sites that people show up to once in a while. There is no community around a general "let's recommend stuff!" setup. What we do is rather specialized, that's true. We do expert-knowledge-based Q&A as much as we can, and we (arguably) do it really well. We currently have no interest in establishing a site that goes directly against everything we're trying to build and teach on every other site we run. We're more into trying to establish a consistent experience across the network rather than introduce major differences.
    – Adam Lear StaffMod
    Commented May 19, 2013 at 9:08
  • +1 I think it would be great fun to have a non-constructive stack exchange site. You might call it trolls.stackexchange.com :D
    – Andomar
    Commented May 19, 2013 at 17:10

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .