Meta Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for meta-discussion of the Stack Exchange family of Q&A websites. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Is there any official policy for mandatory use of the spoilers feature on fiction or literature sites, like https://scifi.stackexchange.com/, or is just a courtesy/fully voluntary?
I didn't see anything on the FAQ.
Is there any particular action that should be taken on posts that do not contain spoiler blocks?
Also, for example What's with the duck pond? I understand that there might not be much left if you blotted out all the spoilers.
Should posts like that be handled any differently?
I don't think there's any network-wide policy on spoilers. Those particular sites may have policies, but you'd need to ask them. For your scifi example, the question was already asked, but got closed as a duplicate of a post that doesn't seem to address the issue (they focused on how to mark spoilers, instead of whether or not it's mandatory)
This is not a network policy, but it's my policy.
spoiler tag, it's meaningless.
Dec 5, 2011 at 22:24
Literature moderator here.
Literature SE does not yet have a formalized spoiler policy. The issue has never come up yet.
As Michael Mrozek said, there is no network-wide policy. I don't know if Literature will ever develop one, but for now common sense applies: if you are asking about something that can ruin the book for someone, mark it as a spoiler. I don't think this is gonna be a huge issue for Literature, since it should be fairly easy to avoid questions about specific books or authors if you're worried about spoilers.
Spoiler markup should never be mandatory and is more a courtesy for other users who have never bothered to watch the movie, television show or read the book discussed that's been out for some time.
Inside a year is probably about how much leeway you should have. But then it's entirely possible to write a spoiler free title and first sentence or two without revealing anything too pivotal.
If a user clicks through when they haven't seen it, they've only themselves to scold. Why bother trying to answer about something you haven't got any experience in?
If you're going to ask a question about it, and the title has been out for at least five years, then all bets are off about needing to shield eyes. If you haven't seen the film by that statute of reasonable expectation, it's not coming out of your Netflix queue any time soon.
