This is related to the other question I just asked about improving the on-page guidelines for tag wiki edits. Since I know, in the back of my mind, that there will always be people who don't read the instructions even if the guidelines are relevant and helpful, I'd like to avoid having to always copy and paste the link to that one blog post when rejecting useless tag wiki edits.
Copied content doesn't always apply since sometimes people paraphrase, and neither too minor nor invalid edit really seem to fit the spirit (the content wasn't necessarily poor, just irrelevant).
Something like the following (only for tag wikis, obviously):
Too general: This edit presents a generic definition of the tag topic instead of explaining its intended use. For more information, see our guidelines for writing tag wikis.
Or maybe even something that would cover all of the guidelines, such as:
Not helpful: This edit does not follow any of our tag wiki guidelines and is unlikely to help instruct future visitors in the appropriate use of the tag.
Basically any rejection reason that clearly communicates the concept of that's a good definition, but we don't want definitions and links back to that blog post would be nice.