114

As per the FAQ for Stack Exchange sites, this FAQ will serve the following purposes:

  • To be the canonical reference for moderators across the Stack Exchange sites for things that are beyond question (typically, "how" questions)
  • For situations that a moderator will face, provide information to help understand the nuances of that situation, so that the moderator can make best possible decision that is in the interest of their Stack Exchange site and Stack Exchange in general (typically, "when" questions)
  • To bring new moderators on sites (pro tempore or elected) up to speed quicker.

Essential Reading

Tools

Post content

Voting to Close

Comment flags

Profile content

Abuse

Post notices

Chat

People

Miscellaneous

  • @Won't I'm doing that a bit now, but yes, things that are user-specific should be removed unless it's something that is overwhelmingly relevant to a moderator. – casperOne Jan 13 '12 at 16:46
  • @MichaelMrozek we have to probably create some self-answered questions just to provide a more useful bullet point or linking to existing stuff – Ivo Flipse Jan 13 '12 at 16:52
  • 5
    @IvoFlipse That's fine, but we really don't need to cover (picking the first one I see) "What is the etiquette for modifying posts?". That isn't a diamond moderator issue -- editing posts is a normal user action – Michael Mrozek Jan 13 '12 at 16:54
  • @Aarthi I suggest you simply ask a new question and we write up the canonical answer for it, without it looking like some feature request. – Ivo Flipse Jan 13 '12 at 19:01
  • @Aarthi This is by no means definitive or comprehensive; the idea is that we evolve this as we come across the content or get the canonical answers to it. The meta FAQ didn't evolve overnight, nor did this (although this will be epic). – casperOne Jan 13 '12 at 19:08
  • @RobertHarvey Do we want to change the format? When discussed, we wanted to keep the spirit of the FAQ, which does not have an answer. If we put answers in, then we become a little like Mark's cheat sheet, and we're duplicating effort. – casperOne Jan 20 '12 at 18:12
  • @casperOne Are you saying it needs its own question? I'm OK with that, I guess. I just thought it would be nice if it stayed here, but became a first-class citizen. It doesn't seem to merit its own question. – Robert Harvey Jan 20 '12 at 18:19
  • @RobertHarvey It would be nice, since there were also comments that we should create canonical Q&A to fit this and this would be defined as "good canonical". – casperOne Jan 20 '12 at 18:22
  • I wanted to know if in any of the Stack Exchange sites will I get a reduction in reputation points for putting a comment or up voting an answer or a question? – whatthefish Feb 14 '18 at 19:24

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by Robert Harvey Jan 13 '12 at 16:52

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Browse other questions tagged .