12

There's a tag on SO: , which refers to the function print_r() in PHP. Currently , 43 out of 46 questions are also tagged (and one more tagged ).

According to the FAQ, a tag that cannot stand alone in a question should not exist, since this tag is dependant on the tag, it should be removed.

I say kill it! Kill it with fire!

Possible?

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, ale, Shadow Wizard, Martijn Pieters, nicael Dec 7 '14 at 12:00

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, ale, Shadow Wizard, Martijn Pieters, nicael
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Yes. And the echo tag to go with it (as long as it's paired with php) – Pëkka Feb 17 '12 at 8:37
  • 2
    Could you explain further why this tag is bad? – AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 9:36
  • 6
    @AakashM - should there be a tag for every single PHP function? – Flexo Feb 17 '12 at 9:46
  • 1
    @AakashM edited. But I think woodland already did the explaining. – Madara Uchiha Feb 17 '12 at 12:56
  • 1
    Sending out the signal... Please hold... – Lix Feb 17 '12 at 13:10
  • 1
    But that's an argument for renaming it to, I don't know, php-print-r or similar, rather than deleting it. And @awoodland the choice isn't between 'none' and 'all'. If there are 40+ questions about this function then why shouldn't there be a tag? – AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 13:13
  • 2
    @AakashM tags for specific parts of an API feels like a case of can't see the wood for the trees - i.e. getting caught in in the implementation details and missing the big picture – Flexo Feb 17 '12 at 13:22
  • 1
    Hmm, ok, having done some research I see that print_r is actually just a somewhat uninteresting statement (I thought it might be something as exciting as, say, ls ). Objection withdrawn, although I think I'm still more tag-inclusionist than most people round here... – AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 13:36
5

Sigh. We don't need a tag for every single function in every single programming language. Most of the questions in are "why does it look like that" and "how do I parse the output." A few were about using it to assist in debugging.

As such, it's now gone. I cleaned up some horrible tagging along the way, like adding appropriate debugging tags.

While nuking, I discovered and , which has around 46 questions. I've nuked , as it only had 4 questions, but I've left alone when it wasn't paired with . It should also be nuked, but that'll be a different discussion. Most of the questions are probably going to be about debugging (or, worse, parsing output... sigh).

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .