I propose to remove the tag and merge it with the tag. The reason is that I do not know what exactly means apart from the IMO correct tag (there is neither an excerpt nor a wiki). The discipline is called numerics, the adjective is .

  • 1
    I'd propose that they'd be removed. They sound more meta than anything. Mar 24 '12 at 21:03
  • 1
    How do you tag then questions about rounding errors or numerical methods like root solver, numerical integration and optimization problems ? Mar 24 '12 at 21:12
  • Not everything needs a tag for it. [numeric] or [numerical] does not work great as a standalone tag AFAIK... do you have a stronger case for why they are needed as-is? Right now, I'm looking at this in the same way like how [curly-brackets] was for tags. Mar 24 '12 at 21:35
  • How do you tag questions like: I am working on a game or simulation and I need to calculate a combination of functions (sin, cos, haversine) as fast as possible, but I need only e.g. 18 bits precision ? It is not a question of an [algorithm]. Mar 24 '12 at 22:51
  • 3
    I believe you're describing numerical analysis.
    – user102937
    Mar 24 '12 at 22:57
  • 1
    I could see [numerical-analysis] working as a standalone tag. That sounds a lot better than [numeric] and [numerical] which is ambiguous. [numerical-analysis] is much more specific. Mar 24 '12 at 23:12
  • Good point. I see that there is also a strange [numericalupdown] tag ?! How about merging all numerical tags including numerical analysis to "numerical" ? It is shorter and I believe far less people know the term "numerical analysis". Mar 24 '12 at 23:13
  • @ThorstenS. But if someone's typing "numerical" in the tag box, "numerical-analysis" would appear as an option and the tag wiki would clearly demonstrate that it's what they're looking for. I think "numerical-analysis" is the proper tag to merge these into.
    – WendiKidd
    Sep 3 '12 at 18:48

Browse other questions tagged .