Case in point: gist in C++ chat. It fills the whole screen. Or, as DeadMG puts it:

whoah, giant wall'o'text

I suggest reducing the max-height by half, i.e. 300px. That should be enough.

  • +1 People should understand their code and only include the relevant parts, otherwise explain what their code does (which is usually just copying the comments if you're clean coding). I think this is by-design though, so you might want to turn it into a feature request instead where it is 300px by default and an expand link is available just like how the normal fixed font chat messages function... – Tamara Wijsman Apr 2 '12 at 11:17
  • 3
    @Tom Bugs can be by design. As far as I’m concerned this is a UI bug. – Konrad Rudolph Apr 2 '12 at 11:39
  • I was referring more to [status-bydesign], perhaps it has been done with a reason... – Tamara Wijsman Apr 2 '12 at 11:53
  • 5
    @TomWijsman this is the only type of onebox that takes up so much screen estate. Wikipedia, Twitter messages/profiles, SO questions, etc. all seem more reasonable, and the exception for the github onebox violates the principle of least surprise. – sehe May 15 '12 at 15:59
  • the Amazon box is also pretty huge, but not quite as big as the gists – Ben Brocka Aug 10 '12 at 15:21
  • Code you enter directly into the textbox is more limited than oneboxed gists. If anything, it should be the other way around. This is silly. – Jeremy Banks Aug 10 '12 at 17:11
  • 1

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .