7

The tag is used very ambiguously, usually alongside a tag that provides the meaning that is ambiguously intended by .

It has no tag wiki, as no one appears to agree on a meaning. It only adds noise to the system, provides no useful grouping, and I can't imagine it's ever actually been used to help someone find content.

I'd like to recommend it be removed from the system.

closed as off-topic by Rand al'Thor, Sonic the Anonymous WizHog, PolyGeo, Ward, rene Oct 21 '18 at 6:27

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question's topic is only applicable to one specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should relate to features or policies that commonly apply to the network or the software that drives it, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Rand al'Thor, Sonic the Anonymous WizHog, PolyGeo, Ward, rene
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    Why not take care of [end] while we're at it? – Mat Apr 12 '12 at 19:06
  • 2
    @Mat: We have to [start] first, before we can [end]. – Cody Gray Apr 12 '12 at 19:12
  • [end] tag appears to be juuust as ambiguous. – Sam DeHaan Apr 12 '12 at 19:13
3

I agree that these two tags don't add much value, there are some questions tagged which refer to PHP's end function, and I'm sure there are other frameworks/systems that have similar APIs.

However, these tags on their own can't support a question, so I've added them to the list of tags requiring cleanup in https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/128315/the-great-stack-overflow-tag-question-cleanup-of-2012

So feel free to remove them, and update the main post with the progress as they're removed from the system.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .