(Note, this isn't a duplicate of Where should a question about LaTeX usage go?, as the answers focussed on a specific question asked, which was about how to format bibliographies in LaTeX.)

It seems that LaTeX questions should go on Stack Overflow, not Super User. Reasons:

  • nearly 300 questions with a LaTeX tag on Stack Overflow
  • LaTeX is a combination of of document preparation and programming.
  • Advanced LaTeX questions are not going to be answerable by non-programmers

Yet, Recommended build system for latex? (asked by me) got a vote-to-close (as well as other questions I've seen).

Can we get a ruling for general LaTeX questions?


Everyone here seems to agree. Can we get an argument from the people who vote to close?

  • 5
    I am really beginning to wonder where the other side is on this. LaTeX questions have recently been receiving 1--3 close votes each. Isn't someone going to argue that side here? I really would like to know why people keep at it. Commented Aug 6, 2009 at 21:55
  • 1
    I just asked a simple LaTeX question on SO and after 6 minutes got the first close vote. I replied with a link to this question. Maybe the same needs to be done on other LaTeX questions?
    – akaihola
    Commented Feb 9, 2010 at 13:32
  • 3
    Some people are allergic.
    – Rosinante
    Commented Jul 4, 2010 at 14:41
  • 10
    Unfortunately there's a school of thought that, baldly stated, goes "I don't understand it, therefore it needs to be closed." Commented Jul 4, 2010 at 19:42
  • 2
    There is a proposal for a question/answer website like stackoverflow, from the same family, just for LaTeX (area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2148/…). Maybe this will have to be the solution....
    – Vivi
    Commented Jul 5, 2010 at 0:48
  • @Vivi: Many of us hope so! I have 4 questions and 104 answers on SO's [latex] tag, and its not the part of SO I like most, not by far. Good people, like Taco Hoekwater, have commited the Latex&c proposal, I'm guessing that site will be better. Commented Jul 6, 2010 at 8:52
  • @Charles Stewart: the wait kills, though... I hope it doesn't take too long!
    – Vivi
    Commented Jul 6, 2010 at 10:47
  • 1
    @Jeff: What does [status-completed] on a [discussion] mean?
    – kennytm
    Commented Nov 20, 2010 at 9:20
  • 2
    @kennytm there was a ruling -- either take it to tex.stackexchange.com if you want, or don't. There is a place for it now. Commented Nov 20, 2010 at 17:49

5 Answers 5


Late addition: 1 September 2010:

With the Tex, LaTeX and Friends Stack Exchange beta site humming along and looking like it will survive (though we still haven't been appraised of the rules) I endorse posting most LaTeX questions there instead of to Stack Overflow.

I still stand by my position that such questions are on topic on SO (as outlined below), but feel you are likely to get a faster response on the specialty site.

I've been fighting this battle for months now.

LaTeX questions are appropriate on StackOverflow because:

  • TeX and all its derived languages are Turing complete. Every document is a program, and problems are equivalent to "How do I get output X?" questions in any other language.
  • Many problems are solved by "redefine macro \foo" or "define macro \Foo that extends \foo". These are programming solutions to programming problems.
  • Some problems are solved by "get package Bar from CTAN", but if these are out than so are perl questions where the answer is "get Bar from CPAN", or even C++ questions where the answer is use Boost::Bar.
  • If "it's a layout language" is an acceptable argument against LaTeX, it applies even more to HTML and CSS, both of which are widely accepted and much more prevalent on StackOverflow.

Moreover, at this point we have a increasingly nice collection (more than 250) of LaTeX questions and answers on StackOverflow, and more than a dozen users with 20 or more upvotes in the tag. Some of the questions are very basic, many are of fairly general application, and a few are really deep magic. Any attempt to more the focus to SuperUser would either fracture than population and expertise, or necessarily introduce questions to SuperUser which are rather more "programmy" than the culture there. The more esoteric ones would be even more out of place on SU than "How to I get boldface in LaTeX?" questions would be on SO.

Pure politics (rather than technical argument):

I know of only one LaTeX questions that has ever been closed on SO, and it didn't stay that way. This suggests to me that the pro-close side is rather smaller than the group of active users in the tag. My view would be that this in and of itself constitutes a consensus in favor of LaTeX on StackOverflow. YMMV.

  • 1
    Not a very good answer, imo. See mine for details.
    – sgm
    Commented Jul 17, 2010 at 23:18
  • 3
    What bugs me about this answer is the implication that some LaTeX questions being SO-fodder meaning that all LaTeX questions are fine. I can write a macro in Word: does that imply that "how do I make bold the default when typing in Word" is a SO question? Commented Jul 18, 2010 at 8:41
  • 1
    @Marc: I'm happy to see certain latex questions go elsewhere, but at the time of this question every latex question on SO was receiving close votes. Usually from people who would not defend them in the comments. Commented Jul 18, 2010 at 13:51

First of all, I have nothing against HTML or CSS questions on stackoverflow.

That said, whenever I see a LaTeX question closed and I remember that there are several thousand HTML questions I don't understand the world anymore.


  • HTML: 5,737
  • CSS: 4,232
  • LaTeX: 272

What have questions like

What is the best way to create rounded corners using CSS?


What are good resources for CSS templates or templated layout sites?

to do with programming? And there are literally thousands of them on stackoverflow.

I'm perfectly OK with that, but please: relax when you see a LaTeX question.

  • 5
    That you so much for reminding me of this: I knew I was forgetting one of my usual lines of reasoning. Commented Aug 6, 2009 at 18:34
  • 4
    I think a common route for new programmers in the last decade has been: a little static html, then add style sheets, then take up java script or action script, and bang they're programming. And writing web pages by hand feels like programming. So those questions are tolerated, and I won't complain either. Commented Aug 6, 2009 at 19:12
  • To be fair, people do web apps with html, js and css, not (as much) with *TeX templates. :)
    – badp
    Commented Jul 4, 2010 at 13:25

I've changed my mind. I think dmckee is right, to paraphrase Latex questions might be better on TL&F, but they're just as OK on SO as they always were. But for the record, my original argument.

Now that tex.sx has launched, this question maybe deserves reconsideration. Suggestion:

  1. The most important virtue of the new site is that it makes the whole SO/SU thing go away: the site is as happy with installation issues and pointers to packages as it is with nuances of \expandafter. So now, it makes much more sense in nearly all cases for questions to be asked on tex.sx, not SO or SU. 2. But there are two classes of exception. Firstly, there are questions whose trickiness is almost entirely in the system underneath: compiling LyX comes to mind as an example. These questions are quite likely to be better off on SU. Note, however, that anything to do with installing Texlive, Miktex, Mactex, or standard free PS/PDF tools are not going to be outside the competence of the tex.sx community. 3. Then there are questions that involve Tex, but are mostly about coding in, say Java: say putting together an Eclipse workflow, most of the problem being how to process the output of Pdftex in i-Text. These questions are likely to be better off on SO. But note, the tex.sx site has strengths in terms of coding both in C and in Lua, and in XML processing.

But now, I think the consensus should move to say that few Latex questions are appropriate for SO.

FWIW, I've made a Stack Exchange tag set tracking questions about Latex &c that are not on tex.sx.

  • At this point I will ask all my LaTeX questions on TL&F, and I suppose I'll go back to writing comments to that effect for a while (which I did aggressively for about two weeks after my edit in September), but I don't think that the existence of the new site really changes the on-topic-ness of questions on SO; its just that TL&F is a better match. Commented Nov 12, 2010 at 17:20

LaTeX related questions on Superuser appear to be focused on integrating LaTeX with editors, identifying LaTeX files, and converting non-LaTeX files (e.g. Word) to LaTeX format.

I think that the general consensus of question submitters is that "How do I do X in LaTeX" is a programming question that's more appropriate for Stack Overflow.


Late to the party, but I now take a narrow view of what Latex questions should be allowed, and since dmckee's answer is the currently-accepted and highest-rated one, and since it's particularly terrible, I'll make my case by rebutting him.

TeX and all its derived languages are Turing complete. Every document is a program, and problems are equivalent to "How do I get output X?" questions in any other language.

This reasoning disingenuously overstates the sophistication of the typical Latex question on S.O. The fact that you can treat Tex like a Turing machine is, for a vast majority of questions on S.O. (and elsewhere), nothing more than a nice bit of trivia that factors rarely into the solution.

Now, if someone does need the programmatic power of Tex, such as if they're getting bugs while writing an original package, then that's a programming question, because they're actually programming. But it's fallacious to say that because a handful of Latex questions involve T.C.-ness and are programming-related, then any Latex question would involve T.C.-ness and be programming related.

Many problems are solved by "redefine macro \foo" or "define macro \Foo that extends \foo". These are programming solutions to programming problems.

Simple transformation macros could go either way, probably more in favor than against. Even so, it's the same sort of fallacy you committed in your previous point to think that this extends to any arbitrary question.

Some problems are solved by "get package Bar from CTAN", but if these are out than so are perl questions where the answer is "get Bar from CPAN", or even C++ questions where the answer is use Boost::Bar.

First, "some problems?" Try "most." But that's debatable unless someone wants to perform a census. But, that's not what's the best part. You see, Perl questions where the answer is "get Bar from CPAN" are justified because it's established that Perl is a programming language. C++ questions where the answer is "use Boost::Bar" are justified because it's established that C++ is a programming language.

You're arguing, then, that Latex questions where the answer is "use this Latex package" are justified because it's established that... wait, what was that you were trying to prove, again?

If "it's a layout language" is an acceptable argument against LaTeX, it applies even more to HTML and CSS, both of which are widely accepted and much more prevalent on StackOverflow.

I agree with your statement that Latex questions are comparable to another class of questions that are a clumsy fit for S.O.? Or were you doing the whole "two wrongs make a right"-style of justification. In any case, perhaps I should point out a certain site called Doctype.com, which is meant for HTML and CSS Q&A? Mayhap you've noticed the link to the site in the page footer on every Trilogy site? Mayhap you saw the same getting advertised on the Official Stack Overflow Blog?

While we certainly encourage web design questions involving HTML and CSS on Stack Overflow, it’s intended first and foremost for programmers. So if you’re a web designer, and less of a programmer, you might find a better audience for your question (plus some cool auto-screenshot capabilities) at Doctype.

What does this mean in practical terms?

  • Our /faq will direct designers with pure HTML/CSS web design questions to Doctype, to better serve this subset of our audience.
  • Our “hero roster” at the bottom of every page will offically list doctype.com as a member of the team.
  • We will host Doctype discussion on meta, so the Doctype developers can participate and respond to community reactions and feedback for their site.

Moreover, I do not see any hypocrisy in stating that "O.K. guys, from this point on, if you're not making Tetris in Latex, your question's getting locked," and simply grandfathering in all the existing Latex questions. I do have a problem with using inertia as a reason to maintain the status quo.

Also, with the passage of time it now seems fairly likely that Latex and co. will get their own dedicated S.E. site, which weakens the argument that Latex is allowed on S.O. even further.

  • 6
    I could almost support you on few of the questions we get using the programming aspects of the languages except that suggesting that writing or extending a macro is not programming is ludicrous. By definition the asker rarely knows when a question will require this kind of transformation. So, you would ask the poster to judge where to put a questions on the basis of an answer that they do not know. My argument about the archives is that you can not hold "get this solution someone else mode" against latex unless you hold it against other tags. The HTML situation is new. Commented Jul 18, 2010 at 3:35
  • 2
    Further to what @dmckee said, a nice example of this: stackoverflow.com/questions/2631973/…. The question seems to ask for putting in standard markup, as two answerers said, but that doesn't work. Fixing the problem required me to look through the package and redefine its internals to make it possible to define the markup in the usual way. Commented Jul 18, 2010 at 13:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .