-10

Possible Duplicate:
Can the lower bound of a “bounty” be smaller?

I want to point out that why bounty could be start according to the suggested points by Stack Overflow. It could be user defined how much a user wants to start with. If I have a question of 10 reputation so why should I start bounty with 100 or 50.

7
  • 11
    How are you sending the rest of the question? TV broadcast?
    – Matt
    May 29, 2012 at 12:57
  • @Matt what do you meant?
    – RTA
    May 29, 2012 at 12:59
  • 3
    Your question ends with: so why i will s
    – slhck
    May 29, 2012 at 12:59
  • 6
    @RTA: Have you re-read your question? It makes no sense. And ends with a half sente
    – Matt
    May 29, 2012 at 13:00
  • 8
    I think I have discovered why your Stack Overflow questions are not getting good answers...
    – Cody Gray
    May 29, 2012 at 13:00
  • @Matt oooo i just correct that one
    – RTA
    May 29, 2012 at 13:01
  • How you judge your own question?If you have any problem and unable to solve yourself question is bigger for you.But for others may be its simple.So don't try to judge your own question.
    – 4b0
    May 29, 2012 at 13:08

1 Answer 1

21

Bounties are considered special.

If users were able to place trivial amounts of reputation for bounties, everyone would to it in order to seek attention for their questions. This in turn would render the concept of bounties useless — imagine a place where every unanswered question had a little bounty on it …

I personally wouldn't like that, and it would even discourage users from looking at "featured" questions if there were too many of them, with too little incentive for answering those.


Remember that everyone here works hard for their reputation, so you need to earn the privilege to place a bounty first. And don't forget, if you post a really good question, it's easy to get back a little reputation from upvotes on it later, once you place a bounty.

4
  • 2
    THAT is a whole lot of featured questions right there....
    – Lix
    May 29, 2012 at 13:02
  • 5
    It's even over 9000!
    – slhck
    May 29, 2012 at 13:02
  • @slhck its not for you.Sorry. its for ... I correct my mistake.
    – 4b0
    May 29, 2012 at 13:10
  • 2
    What 9000?! There's no way that can be right.
    – Ben Brocka
    May 29, 2012 at 13:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .