4

I have added the following URL to my profile as an article: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MM.2010.78

The page gets retrieved ok during the initial edit, but the link that gets placed on the rendered profile page is: http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/www.computer.org/csdl/mags/mi/2010/05/mmi2010050066-abs.html

This just shows an error, so I took just the last part (www.computer.org/csdl/mags/mi/2010/05/mmi2010050066-abs.html), which is a valid link, and added it again. This still gets re-written, this time as http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/mi/2010/05/www.computer.org/csdl/mags/mi/2010/05/mmi2010050066-abs.html

This version of the link gives a 404 error.

8

When indexing the document, we respect the rel=canonical meta tag. In the case of the document above, it's broken. It reads

<link rel="canonical" href="www.computer.org/csdl/mags/mi/2010/05/mmi2010050066-abs.html"/>

...which is interpreted as a relative URL, because is lacks a scheme (http). I'll see if we can work around it. If you happen to know the webmaster at computer.org, ask them to correct it.

4
  • FYI, I have contacted the webmaster (via the email listed on their website) with a link to this very question. Let's see if they respond. In case they do (and don't do so here) I will add their reply.
    – Bart
    May 29 '12 at 17:40
  • 5
    And a reply has been received. I quote: "Thank you Bart for the email. We confirmed this and are fixing it. We will let you know once the fix is deployed."
    – Bart
    May 29 '12 at 18:24
  • Ah, excellent, thanks for contacting them. I had assumed it was just using redirect headers to decide what the final destination page was. So now I have learned something new about canonical URLs too :)
    – Kothar
    May 31 '12 at 9:44
  • I can confirm that they've fixed it and the link is now working correctly. Thanks everyone!
    – Kothar
    May 31 '12 at 10:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .