Currently the migration path options from SO are:

  • Meta.SO
  • Serverfault
  • SuperUser
  • Webmasters
  • Programmers

If we are going to be limited to 5 options, shouldn't we periodically re-evaluate which sites are most appropriate?

Migration stats (10k only) indicate that the top sites for the last 90 days are:

  1. Superuser - 564 - 5% rejected
  2. ServerFault - 278 - 10% rejected
  3. Tex - 157 - 13% rejected
  4. DBA - 144 - 2% rejected
  5. Sharepoint - 127 - 1% rejected
  6. Programmers - 126 - 26% rejected
  7. CodeReview - 100 - 3% rejected
  8. Meta.SO - 81 - 18% rejected
  9. Wordpress - 75 - 14% rejected
  10. Webmasters - 58 - 8% rejected

All these migrations for sites out of the list required a flag and a moderator to process it. This is just extra work for the mod team!

If we had the top 5 destinations by volume as the 5 options, we would have had a net savings of 160 flags to be processed. I suspect we will actually see these numbers change quite a bit if it's easier for users to put questions in the appropriate spot without moderator intervention.

Can we have a review of the migration path list based on migration volume?

Think of the flags!

closed as off-topic by gnat, 3ventic, Martijn Pieters, michaelb958, hims056 May 2 '14 at 3:12

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – gnat, 3ventic, Martijn Pieters, michaelb958, hims056
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    Generally agree, but Meta will always be a migration path, so Meta + top 4 non-Meta instead of top 5? – yoozer8 Jun 5 '12 at 17:56
  • 1
    @Jim That's an option. Based on the numbers it may still be more efficient to flag those posts for moderator attention, though. – JNK Jun 5 '12 at 18:00
  • 31
    Programmers is sixth? Yay!, please remove us from the migration list asap! – yannis Jun 5 '12 at 18:05
  • 1
  • 3
    @Jim And I'm saying it may be worthwhile to re-evaluate that logic. Seven other sites get more migrations than meta, and 4 of those require manual flagging right now. – JNK Jun 5 '12 at 18:12
  • 2
    Do the stats include rejections? IMO any site with a high rejected/total ratio ougjt to be removed. Sometimes community migrations aren't so great. – Manishearth Jun 5 '12 at 18:15
  • @TimManishEarth Good point, I'll add rejection numbers. – JNK Jun 5 '12 at 18:16
  • 3
    @yannis the 26% rejected supports your case. – Manishearth Jun 5 '12 at 18:30
  • 1
    @TimManishEarth That can't be right, the ProgSE stats show a different (larger) number. – yannis Jun 5 '12 at 18:32
  • 1
    These numbers are probably right, but they aren't what is being portrayed here. They are number of incoming migrations, not outgoing: that is, SO received 126 questions from Programmers and rejected 26% of them. – user149432 Jun 6 '12 at 6:24
  • 2
    @MarkTrapp Nope, the ProgSE -> SO rejection is 5% (144 questions). There were 126 questions migrated from SO to ProgSE, but the rejection is 36%. – yannis Jun 6 '12 at 13:47
up vote 62 down vote accepted

We've replaced Programmers and Webmasters migration paths with TeX and DBA, respectively.

Enjoy. :)

enter image description here

  • 12
    +1000000000000000 – JNK Jun 5 '12 at 18:46
  • 2
    Awesome! Thanks Anna! – Aaron Bertrand Jun 5 '12 at 18:47
  • 4
    Bloody hell that was quick! – Kev Jun 5 '12 at 19:11
  • @Kev 54 minutes. That has to be a record :P – Dynamic Jun 5 '12 at 19:24
  • 9
    How plausible would automatically updating this be, based on migration stats? Say every month or so. – Toomai Jun 5 '12 at 19:31
  • 4
    @Toomai Hm, that would be too easy to game, I'd reject migrations just so as Programmers to not get back in that list. – yannis Jun 5 '12 at 19:37
  • 2
    Callooh! Callay! – ChrisF Jun 5 '12 at 21:55
  • 2
    @YannisRizos I think he meant based on # of moves, not # of rejects :P. We all know Programmers has the highest number of rejects – Ben Brocka Jun 5 '12 at 22:50
  • 12
    This is probably worthwhile, but I wish I could type in what I want directly. This is still a pitiful number of our sites... – sarnold Jun 6 '12 at 2:40
  • 24
    Wait... How do we migrate all of our crap to Programmers now? – Cody Gray Jun 6 '12 at 2:56
  • Holy crap, I didn't think the turnaround on this would be that quick. This is awesome. – casperOne Jun 6 '12 at 3:06
  • 5
    @TheEstablishment Flag for moderator attention. We'll feed those flags to the n00bs that come in on the 20th. – casperOne Jun 6 '12 at 3:07
  • SF was replaced with sharepoint at some point..? – 3ventic Apr 15 '14 at 1:19
  • @3ventic'sShadow Yes? – Adam Lear Apr 15 '14 at 3:29

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .