Today, after browsing for some JBoss related Java questions to answer, I noticed this:

jboss tag

I don't understand why this has been done.

Previously, I used the tag as a catch all to view 'questions I have a good chance of answering'. After all, anyone with experience of using JBoss enough to be answering questions, probably has experience of / or that will apply to more than one specific version.

I also used the tag a a quick link to view a list of enterprise related Java questions with a common theme (EJB's, persistence, JMS, RMI etc.). After all, if you're using JBoss, it'll be to gain the use of its designed functions.

From my experience, many genuinely version specific JBoss questions, relate more towards the setup and config (possibly more appropriate on https://serverfault.com/?) of the application server, instead of being a programming problem.

We don't push Java language questions to use a version specific tag. I also checked the Tomcat tag, as it relates to Java questions in much the same way (a very common Java web container), yet the tag there isn't marked "do not use".

What's the correct approach? Should questions use version-agnostic tags at all? Is the case for JBoss different to Tomcat because of question volumes or some other factor?

closed as off-topic by Robert Longson, Donald Duck, Nathan Tuggy, Glorfindel, PeterJ Dec 24 '18 at 1:05

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question's topic is only applicable to one specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should relate to features or policies that commonly apply to the network or the software that drives it, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Robert Longson, Donald Duck, Nathan Tuggy, Glorfindel, PeterJ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    Many of the "great tag cleanup" have had their wikis changed to this while cleanup continues. Don't know if this is one though – Ben Brocka Jun 12 '12 at 14:28
  • Maybe - I know its why I lost my beloved "japanese" tag. :( – Michael Jun 12 '12 at 14:34
  • We need tag trees. (Was that already suggested?) – Ry- Jun 12 '12 at 14:47
  • 3
    I find too that we have too precise tags, they shouldn't precise the version. This makes the tagging hard to guess, inconsistent, and useless for filters and searches. – Denys Séguret Jun 12 '12 at 14:57
  • 1
    @minitech: Searching for tags brings up all of the relevant ones, as you can see in the illustration above. What someone really wants is a burnination, which is ridiculous for this tag. – Robert Harvey Jun 12 '12 at 15:20

I don't agree with the words "Do Not Use" on this tag, but maybe the JBoss community could provide some further explanation. We don't force people to use .NET-3.5 instead of .NET, or C#-4.0 instead of C#, and I don't see why this should be any different.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .