-16

Since Community Wiki posts do not garner Rep for the poster, I suggest that we should be allowed to upvote (or downvote as the case may be) our own posts that are (or were made) Community Wiki.

6
  • 3
    If you think something is worth downvoting, why would you post it in the first place? Your name is attached to your posts, man!
    – Pops
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 16:34
  • 2
    @PopularDemand think about a poll for a feature on a meta site, where one could potentially post both options.
    – Naftali
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 16:34
  • Maybe it was fine when you posted it, but then it gets edited to the point where you don't like it anymore?
    – Toomai
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 16:35
  • @Toomai that you can just rollback...
    – Naftali
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 16:35
  • 3
    I did think about that. First of all, polls are discouraged, even on meta sites. Second, if you must post a poll, you're not obligated to post an answer for the side you don't agree with. Wait for a supporter of that side to show up and do it for you.
    – Pops
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 16:43
  • 1
    By the time your post has become CW, you may not want to stand behind it any longer, and may feel it deserves down-voting... (Not that I've ever actually seen this in practice, it just seems like a theoretical possibility).
    – Flimzy
    Commented Jul 7, 2012 at 6:09

1 Answer 1

15

I disagree.

The main purpose of voting is to separate good content from bad content.

The rep you can gain from those votes is just a side effect, so it shouldn't matter whether the post is Community Wiki or not.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .