More review mayhem: copied content
While this is similar to "What can we do to stop bad edits getting accepted?", this is a direct feature request.
Everyone makes mistakes, but I recently rejected another tag wiki excerpt for copying and pasting straight from Adobe's website, but within seconds a moderator approved the same edit. There was no source, no attribution, or anything, and a quick search would have shown that it was copied.
Would it be possible to have one or more of the following enhancements added to the tag wiki approval process?
When a tag wiki and/or excerpt is submitted, do a quick search of Google and per-emptively reject any suggestions that are 95%-100% copied and pasted and show up in the top X number of Google search results?
Show a small window next to the tag wiki (or excerpt) showing search results that contain a high probability match, so the user can confirm if the text is properly sourced or not.
At a minimum, have the "Approve" button for tag wikis (and excerpts) be disabled until a user checks a box next to it that reads "I have confirmed the text is either original or properly sourced". You would be surprised how much a little checkbox would go to keep people from rapid-fire pressing "Approve". This would probably be the easiest one to do.