Should a post be locked to be voted down (or up) after it gets closed? All the intention is to make the OP(usually newbies) realize the basics and methodology of questioning ..
When a question gets closed and by the comments entered by fellow members OP realizes it! Then why not lock that question for vote-up or vote-down?
2 Answers
No. Voting is part of the process of improving a closed question (even though practically it very rarely happens).
If a closed question is edited to be improved, it should be voted on to reflect its new state.
Voting a question is unrelated to its closed/opened state. A question is voted down if it isn't clear, or if no research effort is visible. Closing is done when the question is either unanswerable, or not worth answering. Often, these go hand to hand, and they partially have the sting effect we want for new "offensive" users. They ask a crap question, they get closed and mass downvoted in 2 minutes, then they (hopefully) learn that their question was lousy.
-
1@Naruto! I am talking about voting down the question .. not about reopening or voting it up! neither about closed answer (btw what is closed answer now???? Dec 8, 2012 at 10:27
-
1my point is simple! To make the op realize about bad question, closing it would be sufficient (or the downvotes before closing) why people still should continue to vote it down! when it is already been (question) declared as an inappropriate? Dec 8, 2012 at 10:30
-
-
I heard it for first time as well! Madara has mystic jutsu's :P Dec 8, 2012 at 10:49
-
Pathetic mortals, wait until my Juubi is awakened completely! All jokes aside, voting a QUESTION is unrelated to its closed/opened state. A question is voted down if it isn't clear, or if no research effort is visible. Closing is done when the question is either unanswerable, or not worth answering. Often, these go hand to hand, and they partially have the sting effect we want for new "offensive" users. They ask a crap question, they get closed and mass downvoted in 2 minutes, then they (hopefully) learn that their question was lousy. Dec 8, 2012 at 12:43
-
way to go madara .. that's much satisfactory answer.. Dec 9, 2012 at 21:13
-
please add those words from your last comment! They bring up good points! BTW let me know when naruto will fight with you in shippuden anime! :( I am tired of waiting because of these fillers :( Dec 10, 2012 at 8:09
-
1@InfantProgrammer'Aravind': Will do. P.S. I'm heading to the anime director's house right now to... share... how much I like his fillers. Dec 10, 2012 at 9:21
-
Closure and voting are orthogonal:
A question which is closed can still be good and popular:
A question which is perfectly acceptable can be unpopular:
A question can be both unpopular and closed (obviously):
Finally a question can be both popular and not closed (of course!):
Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?
I don't see a good argument to couple these concerns. Preventing people from doing something will not teach them anything, and in general there's nothing wrong with the current system (in that it works on the large numbers which is the whole point of voting).
punish
? to discourage newbies?? stackoverflow is to help each other we are not on war!!!!!!!!!punish
the guy..!