4

I would like to suggest merging the following tag pairs:

There are questions tagged with both variants however , and are used more frequently.

One can ask why to merge > . Note a typo in the tag name BTW!

The point is that "svn administration" mostly involves svnadmin tool and the tasks you perform with svnadmin are "svn administration" tasks in any case. :)

EDIT :

I suggest that questions about version control hook scripts should be tagged like this:

closed as off-topic by random, ChrisF, Martijn Pieters, Shadow The Curly Braced Wizard, doppelgreener Aug 19 '14 at 22:44

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – random, ChrisF, Martijn Pieters, Shadow The Curly Braced Wizard, doppelgreener
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    How would you reconcile these with the [svn-hooks], [mercurial-hook], [githook] and occasional poorly used [hook] tags? – ben is uǝq backwards Dec 10 '12 at 13:06
  • @Ben If a question is about Hg pre-commit hook it should be tagged [mercurial-hook], [pre-commit] IMHO. In case of SVN the question should be tagged [svnhooks], [pre-commit]. With git it should look like [githook], [pre-commit]. You raise and interesting question that demolishes my mind, actually. xD – bahrep Dec 10 '12 at 13:13

Browse other questions tagged .