4

These two tags describe the same usage:

(12 questions have both tags)

So, it seems reasonable to combine these tags.

Therefore, I propose to keep and to make the tag a synonym of it because:

  • has (much) more questions it seems that users tend to find this tag more easily
  • other eclipse frameworks use this scheme, see or

PS I am not allowed to propose this synonym in the regular way, because I do not have enough (any?) answers in

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, nicael, Shadow The Dragon Wizard, ale, CRABOLO Oct 8 '14 at 2:33

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, nicael, Shadow The Dragon Wizard, ale, CRABOLO
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • At one time it would have made sense to have two distinct tags, but now combining them as suggested is the right thing to do. – Chris Gerken Dec 14 '12 at 22:51
  • 1
    There is in fact a third tag describing the same thing: [eclipse-emf-ecore]. Should synonymize that one with [eclipse-emf] as well, if there is no good reason to keep the specialization. (I don't see any.) – tobias_k Feb 14 '13 at 21:56

Browse other questions tagged .