How about a “Vote not to close” option to counter the “Vote to close”?
Let's say that there is a question that 40 people consider a real question.
But 5 people consider it not a real question and they can vote, so they vote to close it.That 40 people should wait that the question closes to reopen it.But why not giving the power to vote against the closure of a question?
For example 40 people (the OP can't self-vote) vote to don't close it, 5 people vote to close it so it's +35. It will be closed only if other 40 people vote to close it. All this with all the variants that may come, for example a closure vote may have a higher value than a counter-closure vote.
I think that isn't acceptable that the question in this case has to be closed and reopened.Afterall if many people are interested in the question, and they're giving answers, why closing it? Is that not a real question even if 40 people have understood the question and they're answering to it?