14

Edit: Due to the new banner shown to new users, all sites now have an accurate search engine description.

According to these posts, StackOverflow's description in search engines ("A language-agnostic yada yada yada...") is due to its DMOZ entry.

Unfortunately, it is the only site that has such a description. Not even the other trilogy sites (SF,SU) have one, let alone SE 2.0 sites.

First, why does Stack Overflow rely on a DMOZ entry instead of, say, a meta tag? And why is it the only site to merit a meaningful description? The others just pull up the question that was on top when the search engine most recently indexed it.

(Anticipating an answer saying: "It would require writing up a description for 99+ sites". But even a static SE network description would be an improvement.)

  • 2
    You'd have to ask the DMOZ editors. It's very likely that they're sitting in the unreviewed queue there (and there's several million other sites waiting for review). – ale Feb 8 '13 at 3:31
  • I've lost count of how many times I've submitted my website to DMOZ and still have yet to see it show up anywhere. – uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN Feb 8 '13 at 4:44
  • 3
    DMOZ aside, there's another valid question here, namely, why isn't there a meta tag? – HodofHod Feb 8 '13 at 4:52
  • @Nathan: Bitdefender blocked me from reaching your site, so that's something. – ale May 3 '13 at 19:30
  • @AlEverett: Really? Did it provide any information as to why it was blocked? – uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN May 3 '13 at 19:54
  • @Nat: No, not really. Just "this site is not safe" and "This page is blocked by Bitdefender Cloud protection." (But none of this has anything to do with the question, so...) – ale May 3 '13 at 20:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .