There are 109 qualifying posts on Stack Overflow.

is a general term.

I think it should be deleted.

Strangely enough, some users seem to use it as a synonym for error, although most use it in addition to error.

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, gnat, Monica Cellio, Braiam, ben is uǝq backwards Jan 1 '15 at 23:15

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, gnat, Monica Cellio, Braiam, ben is uǝq backwards
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


I agree! However, I think this should be a half-burnination/half-retag. The tag might be legitimate for some use cases. So use your judgement to decide whether to just remove the tag, or replace it with .

  • Should fatal-error be a synonym for error? – Brian Webster Feb 20 '13 at 22:41
  • @GeorgeWBush: probably – Linuxios Feb 20 '13 at 22:45
  • 1
    A fatal-error smells a bit like an unhandled-exception to me. – tchrist Feb 21 '13 at 18:50
  • @tchrist: That too. – Linuxios Feb 21 '13 at 21:06
  • 1
    @tchrist: Some languages do not have exception handling. – Robert Harvey Feb 24 '13 at 19:37
  • @RobertHarvey: Very true. Especially ones like C. – Linuxios Feb 24 '13 at 19:54

I've gone through the list of questions tagged + and there are now only 15 tagged questions left (mostly in / ).

I don't know Java that well, but as I see it they can either be retagged or . So if somebody from the Java tag could please clean up the last questions that would be great.

That would leave us with:


I would go with as it is valid in / .

I have fixed the / posts. Now the 3 remains.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .