In this question a user copied and pasted code from an article written by someone else. I believe it is unfair to vote the answer up since copying and pasting code/text isn't really doing any work. What do others think about up voting or down voting? I believe in some situations it's ok, no need to reinvent the wheel, but in this situation the source doesn't elaborate well and I think the poster could have at least explained better. Also copying from wikihow and not saying that's where it's coming from isn't (in my opinion) a reliable source. Are some sources more accebtible to copy from than others?
UPDATE: the answer has since been removed