You normally answer a question and you have the opportunity to answer again. The second time, a message is shown suggesting the use of the edit tool, but I think it's kind of wrong. I mean, if you answer something and then you want to say anything else you know that you must use edit.

Why not disable the answer button if you already have an answer?

marked as duplicate by Frédéric Hamidi, Shadow, LittleBobbyTables, Time Traveling Bobby, hims056 Apr 3 '13 at 13:48

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 6
    Because you may have another answer that resolves the problem in a completely different way. – Josh Mein Apr 3 '13 at 13:42
  • But what happen if you just say that you have two ways to answer the question? It's too hard? – Castiblanco Apr 3 '13 at 13:43
  • 3
    @Castiblanco then people can't vote separately on each suggestion, which they might want to do. – Pëkka Apr 3 '13 at 13:44
  • 2
    Josh, Pekka: Wouldn't such question be non-constructive? – BalusC Apr 3 '13 at 13:44
  • 1
    @Chichiray Consider someone wanting to read all the data from an xml file and process it in C#. There are many different options on how to handle that task. – Josh Mein Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • That depends on the question - some questions have a lot of sub questions, which may be answered in different ways (and at different times) – acutesoftware Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • @Josh: Wouldn't such question be overly broad? But yes, I see what you're getting at. I've always just covered all options in 1 answer. This has always worked quite good so far. – BalusC Apr 3 '13 at 13:48
  • @Chichiray: In theory and first glance, yes. But "specific programming problems" can often be solved in multiple ways. That's different to asking questions which encourage multiple answers (polls etc.). – Time Traveling Bobby Apr 3 '13 at 13:48
  • @Chichiray Normally I would too but depending on the scenario I could see how it could be useful to differentiate between which one the community recommends via the number of upvotes. – Josh Mein Apr 3 '13 at 13:49

No, people should be able to post multiple answers if they actually have different suggestions. This way the different suggestions can be voted on separately.

  • 4
    +1 I see what you did there. – Kermit Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • Please note that it makes sense on meta discussions, not on constructive questions :) – BalusC Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • 2
    Argh, the 60 seconds rate limit for additional answers is annoying. – yannis Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • 4
    Ooooh, so it's to get double the reputation... – LittleBobbyTables Apr 3 '13 at 13:46
  • Can't vote up your answer because of rep shortage. But epic! – user217724 Apr 3 '13 at 13:47
  • 1
    @Chichiray Not only Meta discussions, sometimes it makes sense on the main site as well. It's rare but it happens (Code Golf.SE is a good example where multiple answers from the same author are common). – yannis Apr 3 '13 at 13:47
  • 2
    @hims056 I've done this before? Crap, I guess you can't expect new tricks from an old dog ;) – yannis Apr 3 '13 at 13:49
  • 1
    @BlahBlahGrabblesnackers It's certainly a good way to get double the rep (assuming the answers are good, otherwise you'll probably end up losing double the rep). That said, I'm quite the failed rep whore, I posted both answers after I had hit the rep cap for the day. – yannis Apr 3 '13 at 14:06
  • @LittleBobbyTables If your answers are bad, you lose double the reputation. – endolith Feb 6 '16 at 20:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .