I have added a picture to my answer. I did so by providing a link from my own web server and pasting the link to the image into the form ("from the web"). The software in the background silently however takes the image off my server, copies it over to imgur.com an hosts it from there - without informing me about it, and subjecting my image to the copyright and publishing rights of imgur - without my consent.

I think this is highly controversial. In my opinion one or more of the following should be happeneing:

  • Linked images should not be re-hosted at a 3rd party
  • There should be a notice about that when uploading an image
  • there should be a notice about the distribution/copyright issues when uploading an image

Further I see an issue with linking images from 3rd-party websites to SE. I wonder how this is an issue in terms of copyright. I have myself linked pictures in answers from 3rd party sites. And I am not sure how this action is legal from my side, and how it is legal from imgur to host these images, as well how the situation for SE is.

migrated from meta.travel.stackexchange.com Apr 4 '13 at 9:03

This question came from our discussion, support, and feature requests site for road warriors and seasoned travelers.

  • @RoflcoptrException fine with me! – uncovery Apr 4 '13 at 9:02
  • @RoflcoptrException: Agreed. This is a network-wide feature, and changes for Travel-SE specifically are unlikely. Re copyright issue: all content of SE sites is licensed CC-BY-SA, to which you agree to when you post content on the site. I'm sure more about this is to be had on MSO. – mindcorrosive Apr 4 '13 at 9:03

Linked images should not be re-hosted at a 3rd party

Yes they should. Or at the very least they should not be hosted on your own server. There is no guarantee whatsoever that those images will stay around. Something which will be less of an issue with Stack Exchange's Imgur hosting.

Note that "Imgur's "normal" terms of service do not apply to pictures you upload through Stack Exchange."

There should be a notice about that when uploading an image

Perhaps. I don't really see an issue with not explicitly informing users that this happens, but a one time notice might not be terrible. I certainly wouldn't want to be notified each time I upload an image.

there should be a notice about the distribution/copyright issues when uploading an image

Any content you post on SO/SE is licensed using CC-BY-SA. If this is something you don't agree with, the only option is to not post content you can't or do not want to license as such.

  • 1
    When writing "notice" I also do not want to have a popup each time. But the window where you upload the image, there could be a text saying "This image will be copied to imgur.com and hosted under THEIR license. Click for more info". Also, the usage rights at imgur might be different or change from those at SE. – uncovery Apr 4 '13 at 11:55
  • 4
    @uncovery Keep in mind though that it will NOT be hosted under Imgur's license. It will be hosted under SO/SE's terms and conditions. Follow the link I have put in my answer. – Bart Apr 4 '13 at 12:00
  • thanks! It would be great if a link in the upload window could tell that to users! – uncovery Apr 4 '13 at 12:09

Good point. I do agree that some sort of disclaimer should indeed be added especially when there is no way to delete a picture that was added.

However note that you can show external images in your posts without copying them to other hosting, this is done by using the raw <img> tag:

<img src="full image URL here" />

For example:

<img src="http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/Animals_Cats_Small_cat_005241_.jpg" />

Which results in:


  • 7
    But please please please don't do that. It does not change the licensing (afaik) and provides no guarantee that the image will stay around. If it's an essential part of your post, just use SO's hosting via Imgur. – Bart Apr 4 '13 at 9:56
  • 3
    @Bart some pictures might be indeed protected under various copyright terms, in such cases it's illegal to have it copied to different host. – ShaWiz Apr 4 '13 at 9:57
  • 2
    We would need a bunch of laywers to answer this, but if you embed an image like this in a CC-licensed post, I would not be so sure that the image would escape the CC license – Mad Scientist Apr 4 '13 at 9:57
  • @ShaWizDowArd In such cases, don't post it on SO. – Bart Apr 4 '13 at 9:58
  • 1
    @ShaWizDowArd Hotlinking the image is still a copyright violation if you don't have the right to the image. – Mad Scientist Apr 4 '13 at 9:58
  • @Mad OK, might be true I'm not really familiar with the legal aspects. Still, important to know such option exists. – ShaWiz Apr 4 '13 at 9:59
  • There should be then also a disclaimer that you should only link images that you actually have the rights for! – uncovery Apr 4 '13 at 11:57
  • -1, not because this answer is wrong, but to indicate that such a practice is strongly discouraged. – Cody Gray Apr 5 '13 at 4:10
  • @Cody fair enough, brought this as alternative only never said it's good practice. – ShaWiz Apr 5 '13 at 5:55
  • 1
    Case in point (picture) – Sean Allred Feb 7 '15 at 6:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .