There are a few grammatical errors in the API documentation.
This should obviously read “Delete a comment identified by its id.” This isn't 4chan!
12
-
8Comments about punctuation... with multiple exclamation marks?– Ben BardenCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:57
-
lols ꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶꕶ– seheCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:57
-
8It's preferred to point out a grammatical error without the excess moral revolt.– djechlinCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:58
-
1@djechlin Is that a fact?– seheCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:58
-
@sehe it's my opinion, much as the title of this question and the first comment are.– djechlinCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:58
-
3@sehe It is. There are people who prefer it (like djechlin). Therefore, it is preferred.– Ben BardenCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 17:59
-
6Somewhere the author of this documentation is grinning, thinking "that took them way too long to notice".– BartCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 18:00
-
10@Bart, or they're busy building a giant apostrophe.– Frédéric HamidiCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 18:01
-
3OMG!!! Bad grammar is something up with which we should not put!– MattCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 18:10
-
"This isn't 4chan!": I've been doing it all wrong the whole time!!– FelixCommented Apr 9, 2013 at 18:52
-
Its saying you're requested task is compleated?– user206222Commented Apr 9, 2013 at 19:31
-
@Ben Good point– seheCommented Apr 10, 2013 at 7:34
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
This is true. It should be fixed. The degree of intensity with which you push your point may be a bit excessive. While we're at it, the description for /users/{ids}/questions/featured
/me/questions/featured has an erroneous comma. Arguably, the description for /access-tokens/{accessTokens} should have a period instead of a comma (going by the format of the page as a whole).
