17

Found a strange case in this question.

bdonlan's answer was given on May 16 '09 at 2:08, while the question itself was asked a year later on Apr 19 '10 at 18:00.

How did it happen?

2
  • @FrédéricHamidi Merged or not, but it looks damn weird :)
    – VisioN
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 10:36
  • 2
    +1 for eagle eye VisioN...
    – Raynold
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 11:33

1 Answer 1

7

This behavior is the result of a merge operation.

bdonlan's answer originally appeared under this question (posted May 16 '09 at 2:05), which was then merged into the newer one.

3
  • How did you know that? In the earlier question there is a link, but in the later question there is no.
    – VisioN
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 10:38
  • 2
    @VisioN - See the revision of the answer
    – Himanshu
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 10:38
  • OK, yeah. That was the place I accidentally haven't checked. Thanks!
    – VisioN
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 10:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .