18

Found a strange case in this question.

bdonlan's answer was given on May 16 '09 at 2:08, while the question itself was asked a year later on Apr 19 '10 at 18:00.

How did it happen?

  • @FrédéricHamidi Merged or not, but it looks damn weird :) – VisioN Apr 15 '13 at 10:36
  • 2
    +1 for eagle eye VisioN... – Raynold Apr 15 '13 at 11:33
8

This behavior is the result of a merge operation.

bdonlan's answer originally appeared under this question (posted May 16 '09 at 2:05), which was then merged into the newer one.

  • How did you know that? In the earlier question there is a link, but in the later question there is no. – VisioN Apr 15 '13 at 10:38
  • 2
    @VisioN - See the revision of the answer – hims056 Apr 15 '13 at 10:38
  • OK, yeah. That was the place I accidentally haven't checked. Thanks! – VisioN Apr 15 '13 at 10:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .