5

This question was, when posted:

Please justify your answer. As the description on the title, you will know the question.

That's it.

If it isn't currently, shouldn't question length be more of a factor in determining "low quality" questions?

  • 1
    P.S. this even hit the review queue because such a significant percentage was edited: stackoverflow.com/review/reopen/2051846 – ben is uǝq backwards May 4 '13 at 23:24
  • Perhaps there should be a minimum of 89 characters. – Aza May 4 '13 at 23:37
  • I'm not so sure that minimum lengths work that well @Knights, though I agree 89 would have been good in this case :-). There are plenty of good arguments out there against minimum lengths, which is why it's so low. I'm just asking if it should have a greater weight, possibly only in certain circumstances (no idea what the actual algorithm is). I don't understand, at all, how this got through... – ben is uǝq backwards May 4 '13 at 23:39
  • Ah, I was being slightly sarcastic :P Still, point taken. I'm also curious how this did, and something like this didn't. – Aza May 4 '13 at 23:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .